توسعه فرمول‌بندی گاوس-لژاندر-هرمیت-سه‌نقطه‌ای (GLH-3P) برای تحلیل خطی و غیرخطی ارتعاشات سازه‌ها تحت اثر تحریک زلزله

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه بناب، بناب، ایران

2 دانشکده مهندسی عمران و محیط زیست، دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر، تهران، ایران

چکیده

پاسخ دینامیکی سازه‌ها تحت اثر زلزله یکی از مسائل مهم مهندسی عمران است که نیازمند روش‌های تحلیلی دقیق و کارآمد است. روش‌های تحلیل تاریخچه زمانی غیرخطی، ابزاری قدرتمند برای ارزیابی پاسخ دینامیکی سازه‌ها تحت اثر زلزله ارائه می‌دهند. اساساً، این روش‌ها نیازمند فرض یک مدل برای تغییرات شتاب در طول گام و یک روش انتگرال‌گیری مؤثر عددی برای حل معادلات غیرخطی هستند. در این پژوهش، فرمول‌بندی کارآمدی برای تحلیل دینامیکی غیرخطی سازه‌ها تحت عنوان روش گاوس-لژاندر-هرمیت-سه نقطه‌ای ارائه می‌گردد که مبتنی بر قاعده انتگرال‌گیری ضمنی سه-نقطه‌ای گاوس می‌باشد که از درون‌یابی مرتبه سوم به روش هرمیت برای تقریب میان‌گام‌ها استفاده می‌کند. فرمول ارائه‌شده قابلیت تحلیل سیستم‌های غیرخطی هندسی و مصالح را دارا بوده و انواع مختلفی الگوهای بارگذاری را پوشش می‌دهند. متعاقباً، جهت بررسی عملکرد فرمول‌بندی پیشنهادی، تعدادی از سیستم‌های خطی و غیرخطی تحت اثر بارگذاری رکورد زلزله ال-سنترو قرار گرفته‌ و مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. نتایج به‌دست‌آمده از تحلیل‌های روش جدید، با نتایج روش‌های رایج دیگر مانند روش نیمه‌تحلیلی انتگرال دوهامل و روش شبه تحلیلی نیومارک-بتا و روش ویلسون-تتا مورد مقایسه قرار گرفته است. فرمول‌بندی ارائه‌شده از نظر دقت، پایداری، هم‌گرایی و هزینه محاسباتی برتری قابل‌توجهی نسبت به سایر روش‌ها دارد و می‌توان آن را در نرم‌افزارهای اجزای محدود پیاده‌سازی و برای تحلیل تاریخچه زمانی غیرخطی سازه‌های یک درجه آزادی استفاده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Development of Gauss-Legendaire-Hermite-3Point (GLH-3P) Formulation for Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Earthquake-Affected Structures

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Babaei 1
  • Mohammad Reza Hanafi 2
  • Alireza Rahaei 2
1 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bonab, Bonab, Iran
2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The dynamic behavior of structures under seismic loading is a critical consideration in civil engineering, requiring accurate and efficient analytical methods. Nonlinear time history analysis methods, which involve solving the structure's motion equations over time, serve as valuable tools in this regard. These methods consist of two key components: an acceleration model for each step and a numerical integration technique for tackling nonlinear equations. This research presents an effective formulation for nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures, referred to as the Gauss-Legendre-Hermit-3P Method. It's based on the implicit three-point Gauss integration rule and employs third-order Hermite interpolation for approximating intermediate steps. The proposed formula can analyze nonlinear geometric and material systems and handle various loading patterns. To evaluate the performance of this formulation, a series of linear and nonlinear systems were subjected to the El-Centro earthquake record and analyzed. The results obtained from the analyses of the new method were compared with those of other commonly used methods, including the semi-analytical Duhamel integral method, the pseudo-analytical Newmark-beta method, and the Wilson-theta method. The proposed formulation exhibits a significant advantage over other methods in terms of accuracy, stability, convergence, and computational cost. It can be seamlessly implemented into finite element software and employed for nonlinear time history analysis of single-degree-of-freedom and multi-degree-of-freedom structures.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Time-History Analysis
  • Nonlinear Analysis
  • Newmark Method
  • Gauss-Legendre Quadrature
  • Hermite Interpolation
[1] K.-J. Bathe, Finite element procedures, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 1996.
[2] R. Clough, J. Penzien, Dynamics of Structures, 3rd ed., Computers & Structures, Inc, Berkeley, California, USA, 1995.
[3] J. Humar, Dynamics of structures, 3rd ed., CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group), London, UK, 2012.
[4] J. Houbolt, A recurrence matrix solution for the dynamic response of elastic aircraft, Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 17(9) (1950) 540-550. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.1722
[5] M. Dokainish, K. Subbaraj, A survey of direct time-integration methods in computational structural dynamics—I. Explicit methods, Computers & Structures, 32(6) (1989) 1371-1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(89)90314-3
[6] D. Karabalis, D. Beskos, Numerical methods in earthquake engineering, First ed., Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, UK, 1997.
[7] N.M. Newmark, A method of computation for structural dynamics, Journal of the engineering mechanics division, 85(3) (1959) 67-94. https://doi.org/10.1061/taceat.0008448
[8] A. Veletsos, N. Newmark, C. Chelapati, Deformation spectra for elastic and elastoplastic systems subjected to ground shock and earthquake motions, Proceedings of the 3rd world conference on earthquake engineering, 2(2) (1965) 663-682. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4008.8167
[9] R.R. Craig Jr, A.J. Kurdila, Fundamentals of structural dynamics, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2006.
[10] P.L. Gatti, Applied structural and mechanical vibrations: Theory and Methods, 2nd ed., CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group), London, UK, 2014.
[11] A. Chopra, Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 4th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, 2012.
[12] M. Géradin, D.J. Rixen, Mechanical vibrations: theory and application to structural dynamics, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, 2014.
[13] J.T. Katsikadelis, Dynamic Analysis of Structures: Theory and Application, 2nd ed., Symmetria Publications, Athens, Greece, 2012.
[14] P. Mario, W. Leigh, Structural dynamics: Theory and computation, 5th ed., Spinger, New York, USA, 2004.
[15] S.S. Rao, Mechanical Vibrations in SI Units, 2nd ed., Pearson Higher Ed, London, UK, 2017.
[16] J.W. Tedesco, W.G. McDougal, C.A. Ross, Structural Dynamics: Theory and Applications, First ed., Addison Wesley Longman, Menlo Park, California, USA, 1999.
[17] H.M. Hilber, T.J. Hughes, R.L. Taylor, Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 5(3) (1977) 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1002/EQE.4290050306
[18] L. Brusa, L. Nigro, A one‐step method for direct integration of structural dynamic equations, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 15(5) (1980) 685-699. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620150506
[19] O. Zienkiewicz, W. Wood, N. Hine, R. Taylor, A unified set of single step algorithms. Part 1: General formulation and applications, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 20(8) (1984) 1529-1552. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620200814
[20] W. Wood, A unified set of single step algorithms. Part 2: Theory, International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 20(12) (1984) 2303-2309. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620201210
[21] C. Hoff, P. Pahl, Development of an implicit method with numerical dissipation from a generalized single-step algorithm for structural dynamics, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 67(3) (1988) 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90053-9
[22] J. Chung, G.M. Hulbert, A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 60(2) (1993) 371-375. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2900803
[23] S.Y. Chang, Studies of Newmark method for solving nonlinear systems:(I) basic analysis, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 27(5) (2004) 651-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2004.9670913
[24] K.-J. Bathe, M.M.I. Baig, On a composite implicit time integration procedure for nonlinear dynamics, Computers & Structures, 83(31-32) (2005) 2513-2524.
[25] K.-J. Bathe, Conserving energy and momentum in nonlinear dynamics: a simple implicit time integration scheme, Computers & structures, 85(7-8) (2007) 437-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.09.004
[26] K. Bathe, G. Noh, Insight into an implicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics, Computers & Structures, 90(98) (2012) 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.01.009
[27] G. Noh, K.-J. Bathe, Further insights into an implicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics, Computers & Structures, 202(1) (2018) 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.02.007
[28] G. Noh, K.-J. Bathe, The Bathe time integration method with controllable spectral radius: The ρ∞-Bathe method, Computers & Structures, 212(1) (2019) 299-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.11.001
[29] J. Zhang, Y. Liu, D. Liu, Accuracy of a composite implicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 109(3) (2017) 368-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nme.5291
[30] J. Zhang, A‐stable linear two‐step time integration methods with consistent starting and their equivalent single‐step methods in structural dynamics analysis, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 122(9) (2021) 2312-2359. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6623
[31] J. Zhang, A‐stable two‐step time integration methods with controllable numerical dissipation for structural dynamics, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 121(1) (2020) 54-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6188
[32] M. Babaei, Optimized Gauss–Legendre–Hermite 2-point (O-GLH-2P) method for nonlinear time-history analysis of structures, Meccanica, 59(3) (2024) 305-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-023-01752-4
[33] M. Babaei, M.R. Alidoost, M.R. Hanafi, A Novel Numerical Method for Nonlinear Time History Analysis of MDOF Structures: Newton-Cotes-Hermite-4Point, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 1(1) (2023) 1-20. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22065/jsce.2023.400538.3134
[34] M. Babaei, M.R. Hanafi, A Novel Method for Nonlinear Time-History Analysis of Structural Systems: Improved Newton–Cotes-Hermite-5P Method, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 1(1) (2024) 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01345-5
[35] M. Babaei, M. Jalilkhani, S. Ghasemi, S. Mollaei, New Methods for Dynamic Analysis of Structural Systems under Earthquake Loads, Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, 10(3) (2022) 81-99. https://doi.org/10.22075/jrce.2021.23323.1506
[36] M. Hanafi, M. Babaei, P. Narjabadifam, New Formulation for dynamic analysis of nonlinear time-history of vibrations of structures under earthquake loading, Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 28(2) (2024) 1-16. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22034/ceej.2023.54564.2209
[37] M. Babaei, M. Jalilkhani, S. Mollaei, A Numerical Method for Estimating the Dynamic Response of Structures, Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 55(1) (2025) 1-19. https://doi.org/10.22034/jcee.2021.41770.1963
[38] F. Moodi, M.R. Hanafi, Z. Shariatinia, Toward high sustainability using fully recycled geopolymer concrete: mechanical, rheological, and microstructural properties, RSC Advances, 15(28) (2025) 22953-22971. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RA02249E
[39] A. Atasoy, M.B. Ghalehjoogh, A. Demirkapi, A Novel Approach to Linear and Nonlinear Time-History Analysis of Structures: Gauss–Lobatto–Hermite 4-Point (GLH-4P) Method, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 49(10) (2024) 14205-14224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-08808-x
[40] S. Mollaei, A. Fahmi, D. Jahani, Z. Babaei Golsefidi, R. Babaei, M.R. Hanafi, A Predictive Model for the Strength of a Novel Geopolymer Construction Material Produced by Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Waste, International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 14(1) (2023) 148-167. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.01.015
[41] A. Ekinci, M. Hanafi, P.M.V. Ferreira, Influence of Initial Void Ratio on Critical State Behaviour of Poorly Graded Fine Sands, Indian Geotechnical Journal, 50(5) (2020) 689-699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-020-00416-4
[42] M.R. Hanafi, H. Rahimpour, S. Zinatloo-Ajabshir, F. Moodi, A. Fahmi, Performance enhancement, life cycle assessment, and feature analysis of wheat starch-based NaCl-binder as a sustainable alternative to OPC mortar, Results in Engineering, 24(1) (2024) 103281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103281
[43] A. Fahmi, S.R. Zavaragh, M.R. Hanafi, H. Rahimpour, S. Zinatloo-Ajabshir, A. Asghari, Facile preparation, characterization, and investigation of mechanical strength of Starchy NaCl-binder as a lightweight construction material, Scientific Reports, 13(1) (2023) 19042. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46536-8
[44] M. Hanafi, A. Abki, A. Ekinci, J.d.J.A. Baldovino, Mechanical properties of alluvium clay treated with cement and carbon fiber: relationships among strength, stiffness, and durability, International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 24(1) (2023) 2094928. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2022.2094928
[45] M.R. Hanafi, H. Rahimpour, A. Gholampour, S.H. Ghaffar, F. Moodi, H. Zarrabi, A. Fahmi, Geopolymer from Sand Washing Waste: Mechanical, Rheological, and Sustainability Perspectives, Results in Engineering, 1(1) (2025) 108060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108060
[46] A. Ekinci, J. Arrieta Baldovino, E. Aydın, M. Hanafi, Effect of glass fibre on the strength and durability of artificially cemented alluvial clay, International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 18(3) (2024) 275-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2024.2359763
[47] Q.H. Nguyen, M. Hanafi, J.-P. Merkl, J.-B. d'Espinose de Lacaillerie, Evolution of the microstructure of unconsolidated geopolymers by thermoporometry, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 104(3) (2021) 1581-1591. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.17543
[48] M. Hanafi, I. Javed, A. Ekinci, Evaluating the strength, durability and porosity characteristics of alluvial clay stabilized with marble dust as a sustainable binder, Results in Engineering, 25(1) (2025) 103978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.103978
[49] R. Malathy, G. Bhat, U. Dewangan, An improved iterative technique for inelastic time history analysis of single degree of freedom (SDOF) elasto-plastic system, Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, 7(1) (2022) 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-022-00243-5
[50] M. Babaei, J. Farzi, Derivation of weighting rules for developing a class of A-stable numerical integration scheme: α I-(2+ 3) P method, Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, 29(4) (2023) 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236198.2023.2219785
[51] M. Babaei, A Swarm-Intelligence Based Formulation for Solving Nonlinear ODEs: γβII-(2+3)P method, Applied Soft Computing, 1(1) (2024) 111424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111424
[52] M. Babaei, A computational approach to developing two-derivative ODE-solving formulations: γβI-(2+3)P method, Journal of Computational Science, 91(1) (2025) 102653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2025.102653
[53] M. Babaei, An efficient ODE-solving method based on heuristic and statistical computations: αII-(2 + 3)P method, The Journal of Supercomputing, 80(14) (2024) 20302-20345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06137-2
[54] M. Babaei, A swarm-intelligence based formulation for solving nonlinear ODEs: γβII-(2+3)P method, Applied Soft Computing, 162(1) (2024) 111424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111424
[55] A.K. Chopra, Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 4th ed., Pearson, Upper Saddle River, New jersey, USA, 2017.
[56] A. Isidori, Nonlinear control systems: an introduction, 3rd ed., Springer, London, UK, 1985.
[57] S.A. Billings, Nonlinear system identification: NARMAX methods in the time, frequency, and spatio-temporal domains, First ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, 2013.
[58] K. Atkinson, W. Han, D.E. Stewart, Numerical solution of ordinary differential equations, First ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, 2009.
[59] J. Stoer, R. Bulirsch, R. Bartels, W. Gautschi, C. Witzgall, Introduction to numerical analysis, Springer, New York, USA, 1980.
[60] R. Clough, J. Penzien, Dynamics of Structures, 3rd ed., Computers & Structures, Inc., California, USA, 2003.