[1] FEMA-350. Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-frame Buildings, (2013).
[2] Z. Rahmani, M. Naghipour, J. Vaseghi Amiri, and R. Karimnezhad, Comparing Seismic Parameters in Dual Systems Equipped with Concentric and Eccentric Braces and Side Plate Connection, Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(3) (2013) 300-308.
[3] A. Deylami, and M. Yakhchalian. Comparison between" Common Moment Connection" and Moment Connection with Side Plates for Double-I Built-up Columns. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, (2008).
[4] C.C. Chou, K.C.Tsai, Y.Y. Wang, and C.K. Jao, Seismic rehabilitation performance of steel side plate moment connections. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 39(1) (2010) 23-44.
[5] A. Deylami, and M. Shiravand, The Experimental Study on Moment Connection of Beam to Double I Column Using Full Depth Side Plates. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, (2008).
[6] Faridmehr, M.H. Osman, M. Bin Md Tahir, A. Farokhi Nejad, and R. Hodjati, Seismic and progressive collapse assessment of SidePlate moment connection system, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 54(2015) 35-54.
[7] S. Alizadeh, G.A. MacRae, D. Bull, and G.C. Clifton, (2018). Beam Web-Side-Plate Connection Axial Performance. Key Engineering Materials, 763, 174-181.
[8] C. Cismasiu, and F.P.A. Dos Santos. Numerical simulation of a semi-active vibration control device based on superelastic shape memory alloy wires: INTECH Open Access Publisher, (2010).
[9] A. Abolmaali, J. Treadway, P. Aswath, F. K. Lu, and E. McCarthy. Hysteresis behavior of t-stub connections with superelastic shape memory fasteners, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 831-838.
[10] B.R. Ellingwood, B. Taftali, and R. DesRoches. Seismic performance assessment of steel frames with shape memory alloy connections, Part II–Probabilistic seismic demand assessment, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 14 (2010) 631-645.
[11] M. S. Speicher, R. DesRoches, and R. T. Leon. Experimental results of a NiTi shape memory alloy (SMA)-based recentering beam-column connection, Engineering Structures, 33 (2011) 2448-2457.
[12] C. Fang, M. C. Yam, A. C. Lam, and L. Xie. Cyclic performance of extended end-plate connections equipped with shape memory alloy bolts, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 94 (2014) 122-136.
[13] W. Wang, T.-M. Chan, H. Shao, and Y. Chen, Cyclic behavior of connections equipped with NiTi shape memory alloy and steel tendons between H-shaped beam to CHS column, Engineering Structures, 88 (2015) 37-50.
[16] Shen, O. Seker, B. Akbas, P. Seker, S.B. Momenzadeh, and M. Faytarouni, Seismic performance of concentrically braced frames with and without brace buckling,
Engineering Structures,
141(2017) 461-481.
[17] Q. Canxing, Z. Yichen, L. Han Q. Bing, H, Hetao, and T. Li, Seismic performance of Concentrically Braced Frames with non-buckling braces,
Engineering Structures,
154(2018) 93-102.
[18] M. A. Farmani and M. Ghassemieh. Steel beam-to-column connections equipped with SMA tendons and energy dissipating devices including shear tabs or web hourglass pins, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 135 (2017) 30-48.
[19] M. Pouraminian, S. Hashemi, A. Sadeghi, and S. Pourbakhshian, Probabilistic Assessment the Seismic Collapse Capacity of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames Equipped with Shape Memory Alloys. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, (2020). Doi: 10.22065/jsce.2020.236804.2174.
[20] Abaqus, Abaqus/standard. Version 6.11, ABAQUS, Inc., Pawtucket, R.I, (2012).
[21] F. Auricchio, D. Fugazza, and R. DesRoches, A 1D rate-dependent viscous constitutive model for superelastic shape-memory alloys: formulation and comparison with experimental data. Smart Mater Struct. 16(1) (2007).
[22] MATLAB (matrix laboratory), Multi paradigm numerical computing environment and proprietary programming language developed by Math Works, (2013).
https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab