بررسی اثر الیاف پلی‌پروپیلن بر مقاومت فشاری و کششی خاک آلی تثبیت شده با آهک و بیوپلیمر زانتان‌گام

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

چکیده

حضور مواد آلی در خاک باعث کاهش مقاومت فشاری و برشی خاک شده و مشکلات مربوط به نشست‌های تحکیمی اولیه و ثانویه را به شدت افزایش می‌دهد. استفاده از روش تثبیت و تسلیح دو راهکار معمول برای بهبود پارامترهای مقاومتی خاک برای کاربرد در پروژه‌های عمرانی است. در این پژوهش اثر الیاف ضایعات نخ پلی‌پروپیلن بر خاک تثبیت شده بررسی شد. بدین منظور از آهک و بیوپلیمر زانتان‌گام به عنوان ماده تثبیت‌کننده و از الیاف ضایعات نخ پلی‌پروپیلن برای مسلح‌سازی خاک استفاده شده ‌است. برای انجام آزمایش‌ها از 1 و 3 درصد وزنی آهک، 1 و 1/5 درصد وزنی بیوپلیمر زانتان‌گام و 0/5 درصد وزنی الیاف پلی‌پروپیلن استفاده شد. برای بررسی اثر این مواد بر مقاومت خاک آزمایش مقاومت فشاری تک‌محوری و کشش غیرمستقیم انجام شد. زمان عمل‌آوری نمونه‌ها 7 و 21 روز در نظر گرفته شده ‌است. نتایج آزمایش‌ها نشان داد که افزودن آهک، بیوپلیمر زانتان‌گام و الیاف پلی‌‌پروپیلن مقاومت فشاری را افزایش داده ‌است. افزایش زمان عمل‌آوری مقاومت خاک تثبیت شده با آهک و بیوپلیمر را افزایش داده و افزودن الیاف شکل‌پذیری خاک را نیز بهبود بخشیده است. بیشترین مقاومت کششی در نمونه تثبیت شده با بیوپلیمر زانتان‌گام مشاهده شد و در یک درصد آهک افزودن الیاف مقاومت کششی را نیز افزایش داده است. نتایج بدست آمده نشان می‌دهد، جایگزین کردن زانتان‌گام به جای آهک بصورت قابل توجهی موجب افزایش و بهبود پارامترهای مقاومتی خاک شده و با توجه به اینکه این ماده دوست‌دار محیط زیست می‌باشد، می‌تواند جایگزین مناسبی به جای آهک باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of the Effect of Polypropylene Fibers on Compression Strength and Tensile Strength of Organic Soil Stabilized with Lime and Xanthan-Gum Bio-Polymer

نویسندگان [English]

  • bahareh ebrahimi alavijeh
  • behnaz zare
  • Maryam Mokhtari
civil engineering department, faculty of engineering, yazd university
چکیده [English]

The presence of organic matter in soil reduces its compressive and shear strength. It is, therefore, not suitable for construction projects. Soil strength can be enhanced by various methods. Stabilization and reinforcement are two common ways of improving soil strength parameters. In this study, the effect of polypropylene fibers on stabilized soil was investigated. For this purpose, lime and xanthan gum biopolymer were used as stabilizers, and soil was reinforced with polypropylene fibers. The experiments were performed using 1 and 3% lime, 1 and 1.5% xanthan gum biopolymer, and 0.5% polypropylene fibers (by dry weight). To investigate the effect of these materials on soil strength, uniaxial compression strength and indirect tensile strength tests were conducted. The processing time of the samples was 7 and 21 days. The results showed that the addition of lime, xanthan gum biopolymer, and polypropylene fibers can increase the compression strength of the soil. Increasing the processing time can also increase the strength of stabilized soil, and the addition of fibers leads to the improvement of soil ductility. The maximum tensile strength was observed in the sample stabilized with xanthan gum biopolymer. In the soil sample with 1% lime, the addition of fibers could increase the soil tensile strength. The results suggest that soil strength parameters can considerably be improved if xanthan gum is replaced with lime. In addition, this material is environment-friendly.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Organic soil
  • Lime
  • Xanthan gum biopolymer
  • Polypropylene fibers
  • Compression and tensile strength
  1. -T. Kim, B. Pradhan, Mechanical and germination characteristics of stabilized organic soils, Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 34(7) (2016) 681-688.
  2. O. Tastan, T.B. Edil, C.H. Benson, A.H. Aydilek, Stabilization of organic soils with fly ash, Journal of geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(9) (2011) 819-833.
  3. Haeri, A. Hamidi, S. Hosseini, E. Asghari, D. Toll, Effect of cement type on the mechanical behavior of a gravely sand, Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, 24(2) (2006) (335).
  4. Bobet, J. Hwang, C.T. Johnston, M. Santagata, One-dimensional consolidation behavior of cement-treated organic soil, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48(7) (2011) 1100-1115.
  5. Chen, Q. Wang, The behaviour of organic matter in the process of soft soil stabilization using cement, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 65(4) (2006) 445-448.
  6. Saride, A.J. Puppala, S.R. Chikyala, Swell-shrink and strength behaviors of lime and cement stabilized expansive organic clays, Applied Clay Science, 85 (2013) 39-45.
  7. R. Zandieh, S.S. Yasrobi, Retracted article: Study of factors affecting the compressive strength of sandy soil stabilized with polymer, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 28(2) (2010) 139-145.
  8. Chang, G.-C. Cho, Shear strength behavior and parameters of microbial gellan gum-treated soils: from sand to clay, Acta Geotechnica, 14(2) (2019) 361-375.
  9. Chang, J. Im, A.K. Prasidhi, G.-C. Cho, Effects of Xanthan gum biopolymer on soil strengthening, Construction and Building Materials, 74 (2015) 65-72.
  10. Latifi, S. Horpibulsuk, C.L. Meehan, M.Z.A. Majid, A.S.A. Rashid, Xanthan gum biopolymer: an eco-friendly additive for stabilization of tropical organic peat, Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(9) (2016) 825.
  11. Smitha, A. Sachan, Use of agar biopolymer to improve the shear strength behavior of sabarmati sand, International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 10(4) (2016) 387-400.
  12. A.S. Correia, M.G. Rasteiro, Nanotechnology applied to chemical soil stabilization, Procedia engineering, 143 (2016) 1252-1259.
  13. Hassan, W.H.W. Hassan, A.S.A. Rashid, N. Latifi, N.Z.M. Yunus, S. Horpibulsuk, H. Moayedi, Microstructural characteristics of organic soils treated with biomass silica stabilizer, Environmental Earth Sciences, 78(12) (2019) 367.
  14. K. Brahmachary, M.K. Ahsan, M. Rokonuzzaman, Impact of rice husk ash (RHA) and nylon fiber on the bearing capacity of organic soil, SN Applied Sciences, 1(3) (2019) 273.
  15. Waruwu, H. Halim, T. Nasution, Y. Hanova, Bamboo Grid Reinforcement on Peat Soil under Repeated Loading, Journal of Engineeering and Applied Sciences, 13(8) (2018) 2190-2196.
  16. E. Abdel-Salam, Stabilization of peat soil using locally admixture, HBRC journal, 14(3)(2018) 294-299 .
  17. Rui, W. Hongxing, T. Yunzhi, W. Lehua, Solidification of High Organic Matter Content Sludge by Cement, Lime and Metakaolin, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 63(1) (2019) 53-62.
  18. Topolinski, Unconfined Compressive Strength Properties of a Cement-Organic Soil Composite, in: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, 2019, pp. 042018.
  19. Bahadori, A. Hasheminezhad, S. Mohamadi asl, Stabilisation of Urmia Lake peat using natural and artificial pozzolans, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement, (2019) 1-10.
  20. K. Kolay, M.A. Rahman, Physico-geotechnical properties of peat and its stabilisation, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement, 169(3) (2015) 206-216.
  21. Tremblay, J. Duchesne, J. Locat, S. Leroueil, Influence of the nature of organic compounds on fine soil stabilization with cement, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39(3) (2002) 535-546.
  22. Islam, N.R. Hoque, M.A. Haque, P.N. Mishra, M. Mamun, S. Dey, Strength development in fine-grained paddy field soil by lime addition, Journal of Building Engineering, 26 (2019) 100857.
  23. Liu, Q. Wang, S. Liu, Y. ShangGuan, H. Fu, B. Ma, H. Chen, X. Yuan, Experimental investigation of the geotechnical properties and microstructure of lime-stabilized saline soils under freeze-thaw cycling, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 161 (2019) 32-42.
  24. Bahadori, A. Hasheminezhad, S. Alizadeh, The Influence of Natural Pozzolans Structure on Marl Soil Stabilization, Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, (2019) 1-9.
  25. Bahadori, A. Hasheminezhad, F. Taghizadeh, Experimental Study on Marl Soil Stabilization Using Natural Pozzolans, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 31(2) (2018) 04018363.
  26. K. Tabari, A. TaghaviGhalesari, A.J. Choobbasti, M. Afzalirad, Large-scale experimental investigation of strength properties of composite clay, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, (2019) 1-15.
  27. Caballero, R. Acharya, A. Banerjee, T.V. Bheemasetti, A. Puppala, U. Patil, Sustainable slope stabilization using biopolymer-reinforced soil, in: Geo-Chicago 2016, 2016, pp. 116-126.
  28. Chen, L. Wu, M. Perdjon, X. Huang, Y. Peng, The drying effect on xanthan gum biopolymer treated sandy soil shear strength, Construction and Building Materials, 197 (2019) 271-279.
  29. Ayeldeen, A. Negm, M. El-Sawwaf, M. Kitazume, Enhancing mechanical behaviors of collapsible soil using two biopolymers, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 9(2) (2017) 329-339.
  30. Hataf, P. Ghadir, N. Ranjbar, Investigation of soil stabilization using chitosan biopolymer, Journal of cleaner production, 170 (2018) 1493-1500.
  31. M. Hejazi, M. Sheikhzadeh, S.M. Abtahi, A. Zadhoush, A simple review of soil reinforcement by using natural and synthetic fibers, Construction and Building Materials, 30 (2012) 100-116.
  32. S. Priya, S. Archana, A.B. Albert, A. Deeraj, Stabilization of clayey soil using polypropylene fiber, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 4(4) (2017) 1252-1255.
  33. A. Anagnostopoulos, D. Tzetzis, K. Berketis, Evaluation of the shear strength behaviour of polypropylene and carbon fibre reinforced cohesive soils, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7(20) (2014) 4327-4342.
  34. Estabragh, S. Ranjbari, A. Javadi, Properties of clay soil and soil cement reinforced with polypropylene fibers, in, American Concrete Institute, 2017.
  35. ASTM D-2974, Standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils, (2007).
  36. ASTM D-2435, Standard test methods for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils using incremental loading, ASTM International, (2004).
  37. ASTM D-854, Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer, ASTM International, (2006).
  38. ASTM D-698,Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3))”, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, (2000) 1-7.
  39. ASTM D-2166, Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil, American Society for Testing and Materials West Conshohocken, Pa, (2006).
  40. ASTM C-496, Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, (2004).
  41. Gowthaman, K. Nakashima, S. Kawasaki, A state-of-the-art review on soil reinforcement technology using natural plant fiber materials: Past findings, present trends and future directions, Materials, 11(4) (2018) 553.
  42. K. Patel, B. Singh, Strength and deformation behavior of fiber-reinforced cohesive soil under varying moisture and compaction states, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 35(4) (2017) 1767-1781.
  43. Tang, B. Shi, W. Gao, F. Chen, Y. Cai, Strength and mechanical behavior of short polypropylene fiber reinforced and cement stabilized clayey soil, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 25(3) (2007) 194-202.
  44. S. Zaimoglu, T. Yetimoglu, Strength behavior of fine grained soil reinforced with randomly distributed polypropylene fibers, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 30(1) (2012) 197-203.
  45. Koslanant, Influence of storage conditions on geotechnical properties of Ariake clay and on its chemical stabilization, Dissertation, Saga University, Japan, 2006.
  46. Latifi, S. Horpibulsuk, C.L. Meehan, M.Z. Abd Majid, M.M. Tahir, E.T. Mohamad, Improvement of problematic soils with biopolymer—an environmentally friendly soil stabilizer, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29(2) (2016) 04016204.
  47. Mahboobimotlagh, A. Mahboobiardakani, Evaluation of the effect of adding lime to shear strength parameters of clay-geosynthetic interface, Scientific Quarterly Journal, GEOSCIENCES, 27(108) (2018). (in persian).