ارزیابی شبکه ذینفعان پروژه های عمرانی به منظور سنجش قابلیت آنها در مدیریت ادعا با استفاده از آنالیز شبکه های اجتماعی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی عمران، واحد علوم تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی، تهران، ایران،

چکیده

پس از فرایند برگزاری مناقصه و عقد قرارداد، تعهدات، مسئولیت ها و اختیارات هر یک از عوامل موثر در پروژه، مشخص و تفکیک خواهد شد. البته لازم به ذکر است معمولاً حجم بسیاری از این تعهدات ، مسئولیت ها و اختیارات در پروژه ها مشابه و یکسان و قابل پیش بینی است. پیچیدگی موارد ادعا در پروژه های ساخت که  عموماً منجر به ایجاد بار مالی و تطویل در انجام کار می گردد، مخصوصا از اواسط پروژه به بعد ایجاب می کند که همه ذینفعان پروژه به منظور مدیریت ادعاهای احتمالی، مطابق انتظار خویش و سایرین، رویکرد مشخص داشته باشند. در این پژوهش پس از شناسایی ادعاها و ریشه یابی مفاهیم آنها، به شناسایی و ارزیابی ذینفعان پروژه به منظور قابلیت سنجش آنها در طرح ادعا با استفاده از تحلیل شبکه ارتباطی بین ذینفعان در یک مطالعه موردی پرداخته شده است. از سوی دیگر از طریق محاسبه سنجه مرکزیت ذینفعان در هر ادعا و جمع بندی آنها، مهم ترین ذینفعان شناسایی گردیدند که می تواند مبناء بخشی از استراتژی مدیران پروژه واقع گردد. نتایج حاصله بیانگر این است که نقش ذینفعان در هر ادعاها بر اساس سنجه مرکزیت، متغیر می باشد که با استفاده از تحلیل شبکه ارتباطی میان ذینفعان در ادعاهای معمول می توان اثربخشی هر یک از ذینفعان را شناسایی و تدابیر لازم برای مدیریت ادعاها را در نظر گرفت. دستاورد این پژوهش می تواند منجر به کمک مدیران در درک بهتر از عوامل کلیدی تاثیر گذار در عملکرد پروژه و در نتیجه مدیریت ادعا و جلوگیری از اختلاف گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Stakeholder network assessment projects to assess their ability to plan claims using social network analysis.

نویسندگان [English]

  • Alireza Sheikhzadegan khiavi 1
  • hamidreza Abbasianjahromi 2
  • Mehdi Ravanshadnia 1
1 Master Civil Engineer- Construction Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch
2 K. N. Toosi University of Technology
چکیده [English]

After the process of holding tenders and concluding contracts and agreements and forming a project management team, the obligations, responsibilities, and authorities of each of the effective factors or project stakeholders will be identified and separated thematically. Of course, it should be noted that the volume of many of these obligations, responsibilities, and authorities in each project is similar and the same. The uncertain and complex situation of claims in construction projects that will lead to financial burden and prolongation of work, especially from the middle of the project onwards, requires that all project stakeholders, to manage potential claims in the project, as expected and other stakeholders have a clear approach. In this study, after identifying the claims and rooting out the concepts related to the claim as well as how to manage it in contracts, to identify and evaluate the project stakeholders and their ability to measure in the claim plan using stakeholder communication network analysis in a case study. On the other hand, by calculating the stakeholder centrality measure in each claim examined and summarizing them, the most important stakeholders and the relationship between them were identified that can be the basis of planning and management. Therefore, using network communication analysis between project stakeholders and common claims, it is possible to identify the effectiveness of each stakeholder and take the necessary measures to manage the claims.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Claim
  • claim management
  • stakeholder network
  • centerality
  • communication network analysis
[1] H.T. M.Golabchi, M.Parchami, M.Bemanian Codification and analysis of closed claim model in non-industrial design and construction projects in Iran, in:  Management research in Iran, 2014, pp. 111-137.
[2] N.A. Bakhary, H. Adnan, A. Ibrahim, A study of construction claim management problems in Malaysia, Procedia economics and finance, 23 (2015) 63-70.
[3] H. Doloi, A. Sawhney, K. Iyer, S. Rentala, Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects, International journal of project management, 30(4) (2012) 479-489.
[4] e.a. M.Alizadeh, Investigating the performance of the project management office in construction projects in preventing contractors' claims, in:  First National Conference on Applied Research in Civil Engineering ,Structural Engineering and Construction Management, 2016.
[5] J. Oftadeh, Social Network Analysis, Sanieh Publishers, 2016.
[6] J. Graham, Physical Proximity-based Measure of Shared Situation Awareness Mechanisms in Military Network Organizations, in:  NAACSOS Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 2004.
[7] M. Sadeghi, Do social media analysis metrics work in all social networks?,  (2012).
[8] a.A.E. H. Abbasianjahromi, A Framework for Project Safety Management by Applying Social Network Analysis, AUT Journal of Civil Engineering,  (2017) 111-118.
[9] M. Nunes, A. Abreu, Applying social network analysis to identify project critical success factors, Sustainability, 12(4) (2020) 1503.
[10] M.L.a.M.H. A. Abbsaian-Hosseini, Social network analysis for construction crews, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT,  (2017).
[11] D. Cisterna, J. Von Heyl, D.M. Alarcón, R.F. Herrera, L.F. Alarcón, Application of social network analysis in lean and infrastructure projects, in:  26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction: Evolving Lean Construction Towards Mature Production Management Across Cultures and Frontiers, 2018, pp. 412-421.
[12] S. Badi, L. Wang, S. Pryke, Relationship marketing in Guanxi networks: A social network analysis study of Chinese construction small and medium-sized enterprises, Industrial Marketing Management, 60 (2017) 204-218.
[13] B.K. Akgul, B. Ozorhon, I. Dikmen, M.T. Birgonul, Social network analysis of construction companies operating in international markets: case of Turkish contractors, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(3) (2017) 327-337.
[14] A. Malisiovas, X. Song, Social network analysis (SNA) for construction projects' team communication structure optimization, in:  Construction research congress 2014: Construction in a global network, 2014, pp. 2032-2042.
[15] S.Z. Dogan, D. Arditi, S. Gunhan, B. Erbasaranoglu, Assessing coordination performance based on centrality in an e-mail communication network, Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(3) (2015) 04014047.
[16] S.V.a.M.S. H. Arbabi, Investigation the function of social network analisis in risk management with stakeholder approach (tehran metro project) Quarterly Journal Of Urban Management Studies,  (2020) 30-46.
[17] M.G.a.N.M.F. A. Bahadorestani, Designing a Model of key Stakholders' Expectations in the Subway Construction Projects, in:  studied in MUR Construction Project, Amirkabir J.Civil Eng, 2018, pp. 217-242.
[18] G. Khaki, Research method in management, 3st Edition Scientific Publishing Center of Islamic Azad University, 2004.
[19] Z. Stojadinovic, Claims on construction projects-quantification and prevention, in:  Proceedings of conference contemporary construction practices, 2018, pp. 83-112.
[20] O. du Preez, Conciliation: A founding element in claims management, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119 (2014) 115-123.
[21] N.M. Yusuwan, H. Adnan, Issues associated with extension of time (EoT) claim in Malaysian construction industry, Procedia Technology, 9 (2013) 740-749.
[22] H. Yuan, H. Ma, Game analysis in the construction claim negotiations, Procedia Engineering, 28 (2012) 586-593.
[23] M. Kumaraswamy, K. Yogeswaran, Substantiation and assessment of claims for extensions of time, International Journal of Project Management, 21(1) (2003) 27-38.
[24] F.S. S. Sajedi, Analysis of claims and disputes in contracts for oil and gas development projects in Iran with solutions, Iranian Journal of Structural Engineering Association, 4 (2017) 173-192.
[25] M.A. N. Ebrahimi, Identify, evaluate and manage risks in contracts Design and manufacture of oil and gas and its impact on prevention Outline of claims and disputes, Iranian Journal of Energy Economics,  (2017) 1-27.
[26] A.R. A. Alizade, M. Mehdikhani, Investigating the performance of project management in preventing contractors' claims in construction projects, in:  First National Conference on Applied Research in Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering and Construction Management), 2016, pp. 1-12.
[27] M.M. A. Harisi, Claim management in construction contracts, in:  Development of facilities and equipment, 2014, pp. 28-32.
[28] M.P. H. Talkhabi, M. Golabchi, Investigating and analyzing the reasons for creating contract claims for the design and construction contracts of underground projects in the country, Journal of Tunneling & Underground Space Engineering,  (2014) 19-35.
[29] A. Khameneh, Provide an executive algorithm for claim management in power plant projects (Case study: South Isfahan gas power plant), in:  The first EPC project implementation conference, 2009, pp. 1-11.
[30] G. Khaki, Research method in management, in:  3st Edition Scientific Publishing Center of Islamic Azad University, 2004.
[31] A.R. A. Davari, Structural equation modeling with PLS, in:  University Jihad Publishing Organization, 2013.
[32] S. Pryke, Social network analysis in construction, John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
[33] J. Merrill, S. Bakken, M. Rockoff, K. Gebbie, K.M. Carley, Description of a method to support public health information management: organizational network analysis, Journal of biomedical informatics, 40(4) (2007) 422-428.
[34] X. Zheng, Y. Le, A.P. Chan, Y. Hu, Y. Li, Review of the application of social network analysis (SNA) in construction project management research, International journal of project management, 34(7) (2016) 1214-1225.
[35] H. Park, W.Y. Jeong, S.H. Han, Social network analysis of collaborative entries for construction firms in international construction projects, in:  26th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), 2009, pp. 169-175.
[36] S. Demirkesen, B. Ozorhon, Impact of integration management on construction project management performance, International Journal of Project Management, 35(8) (2017) 1639-1654.