کنترل ارتعاشات سکوی نفتی فراساحلی تحت اثر بارهای دینامیکی امواج دریا با استفاده از میراگر جرمی نیمه‌فعال خود توان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه مراغه، مراغه، ایران

چکیده

سکوهای نفتی فراساحلی نقش مهمی در صنعت استخراج نفت و انرژی دارند، به همین دلیل کنترل ارتعاشات این سازه‌ها و افزایش طول عمر مفید آن‌ها از اهمیت فراوانی برخوردار است. در این مطالعه پاسخ دینامیکی سکوی نفتی فراساحلی تحت اثر بار موج با دوره بازگشت 100 ساله بررسی شده است. برای کاهش پاسخ دینامیکی عرشه سکوی نفتی، میراگر جرمی تنظیم شونده نیمه‌فعال خود توان (SP-SATMD[1]) استفاده گردیده و نسبت جرمی آن به صورت پیش فرض 3 درصد در نظر گرفته شده است. انرژی میراگر سیال مغناطیسی (MR[2]) موجود در میراگر جرمی تنظیم شونده نیمه‌فعال از ارتعاش میراگر جرمی و از طریق یک سیستم استحصال انرژی تامین می‌شود. این سیستم شامل ژنراتور جریان مستقیم DC[3]، رک[4] و پینیون[5] است. رک و پینیون حرکت خطی میراگر جرمی را به حرکت زاویه‌ای تبدیل کرده و آن را برای تولید انرژی الکتریکی به ژنراتور DC اعمال می‌کنند. همچنین خود سیستم استحصال انرژی می‌تواند به عنوان یک میراگر الکترومغناطیس (EM[6]) و الگوریتم کنترلی تناسبی در تعیین میرایی سیال مغناطیسی عمل کند. نتایج بیانگر این است که حداکثر جابه‌جایی و شتاب عرشه سکوی نفتی در حالت کنترل نیمه‌فعال خود توان به ترتیب 15 و 24/16 درصد نسبت به حالت کنترل نشده کاهش یافته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Control of Offshore Jacket Platform under Wave Loads Using Self-Powered Semi-Active Tuned Mass Damper

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mazyar Fahimi Farzam
  • Babak Alinejad
  • Rasool Maroofiazar
  • Motasam Mousaviyan Safakhaneh
Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran
چکیده [English]

Offshore jacket platforms play an important role in the oil and energy industry, so controlling the vibrations of these structures and increasing their useful life is of great interest. In this study, the dynamic response of an offshore jacket platform has been investigated under the effect of wave load with a return period of 100 years. To reduce the dynamic response of the platform deck, a self-powered semi-active mass damper (SP-SATMD) was used and its mass ratio was set to 3% by default. The magneto-rheological damper (MR) energy in the semi-active tuned mass damper is supplied by the vibration of the tuned mass damper (TMD) through an energy harvesting system. This system includes DC direct current generator, rack, and pinion. The rack and pinion convert the linear motion of the TMD into an angular motion and apply it to a DC generator to generate the required electrical energy. The energy harvesting system can also act as an electromagnetic damper (EM) and a proportional control algorithm in determining the damping of the magneto-rheological damper. The results show that the maximum displacement and absolute acceleration of the deck of the controlled platform with a semi-active control strategy decreased by 15 and 16.24%, respectively, compared to the uncontrolled structure.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Jacket Platform
  • Self-Powered Semi-Active Tuned Mass Damper
  • Magneto-Rheological Damper
  • Wave Load
  • DC Generator
[1] B.-L. Zhang, Q.-L. Han, X.-M. Zhang, G.-Y. Tang, Active control of offshore steel jacket platforms, Springer, 2019.
[2] B.-L. Zhang, Q.-L. Han, X.-M. Zhang, Recent advances in vibration control of offshore platforms, Nonlinear Dynamics, 89(2) (2017) 7.55-771
[3] M. FahimiFarzam, S. Mousavi Gavgani, B. Alinejad, G. BEKDAŞ, Optimal control of jacket platform under wave vibration with Active Tuned Mass Damper, Sharif Journal of Civil Engineering, 37(1.2) (2021) 107-117.
[4] B. Ghadimi, T. Taghikhany, Dynamic response assessment of an offshore jacket platform with semi-active fuzzy-based controller: A case study, Ocean Engineering, 238 (2021) 109747.
[5] D. Lin, X. Wang, Observer-based decentralized fuzzy neural sliding mode control for interconnected unknown chaotic systems via network structure adaptation, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 161(15) (2010) 2066-2080.
[6] G. Housner, L.A. Bergman, T.K. Caughey, A.G. Chassiakos, R.O. Claus, S.F. Masri, R.E. Skelton, T. Soong, B. Spencer, J.T. Yao, Structural control: past, present, and future, Journal of engineering mechanics, 123(9) (1997) 897-971.
[7] A. Javanmardi, Z. Ibrahim, K. Ghaedi, H.B. Ghadim, M.U. Hanif, State-of-the-art review of metallic dampers: testing, development and implementation, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 27(2) (2020) 455-478.
[8] P. Martinelli, M.G. Mulas, An innovative passive control technique for industrial precast frames, Engineering Structures, 32(4) (2010) 1123-1132.
[9] M. Gutierrez Soto, H. Adeli, Tuned mass dampers, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 20(4) (2013) 419-431.
[10] J. Den Hartog, Mechanical Vibrations McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York,  (1956) 122-169.
[11] T. IOI, K. IKEDA, On the dynamic vibration damped absorber of the vibration system, Bulletin of JSME, 21(151) (1978) 64-71.
[12] H.-S. Kim, J.-W. Kang, Semi-active fuzzy control of a wind-excited tall building using multi-objective genetic algorithm, Engineering Structures, 41 (2012) 242-257.
[13] A. Kaveh, S. Pirgholizadeh, H.O. Khadem, Semi-active tuned mass damper performance with optimized fuzzy controller using CSS algorithm,  (2015).
[14] M. Safaei, H.A. Sodano, S.R. Anton, A review of energy harvesting using piezoelectric materials: state-of-the-art a decade later (2018-2008), Smart Materials and Structures, 28(11) (2019) 113001.
[15] D. Ning, S. Sun, H. Du, W. Li, N. Zhang, Vibration control of an energy regenerative seat suspension with variable external resistance, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 106 (2018) 94-113.
[16] R. Maroofiazar, M.F. Farzam, Experimental investigation of energy harvesting from sloshing phenomenon: Comparison of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids, Energy, 225 (2021) 120264.
[17] A. Munaz, B.-C. Lee, G.-S. Chung, A study of an electromagnetic energy harvester using multi-pole magnet, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 201 (2013) 134-140.
[18] D.W. Oh, D.Y. Sohn, D.G. Byun, Y.S. Kim, Analysis of electromotive force characteristics and device implementation for ferrofluid based energy harvesting system, in:  2014 17th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), IEEE, 2014, pp. 2033-2038.
[19] J. Scruggs, W. Iwan, Control of a civil structure using an electric machine with semiactive capability, Journal of Structural Engineering, 129(7) (2003) 951-959.
[20] X. Tang, L. Zuo, Simultaneous energy harvesting and vibration control of structures with tuned mass dampers, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 23(18) (2012) 2117-2127.
[21] X. Tang, Simultaneous energy harvesting and vibration control of tall buildings using electricity-generating tuned mass dampers, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2013.
[22] A. Gonzalez‐Buelga, L.R. Clare, A. Cammarano, S.A. Neild, S.G. Burrow, D.J. Inman, An optimised tuned mass damper/harvester device, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 21(8) (2014) 1154-1169.
[23] L. Marian, A. Giaralis, The tuned mass-damper-inerter for harmonic vibrations suppression, attached mass reduction, and energy harvesting, Smart structures and systems, 19(6) (2017) 665-678.
[24] G.L. Lin, C.C. Lin, Y.J. Chen, T.C. Hung, Experimental verification of electromagnetic multiple tuned mass dampers for energy harvesting and structural control, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 50(13) (2021) 3483-3504.
[25] B. Sapiński, P. Orkisz, Ł. Jastrzębski, Experimental Analysis of Power Flows in the Regenerative Vibration Reduction System with a Magnetorheological Damper, Energies, 14(4) (2021) 848.
[26] Z. Wang, Z. Chen, B.F. Spencer Jr, Self-powered and sensing control system based on MR damper: presentation and application, in:  Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2009, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2009, pp. 729240.
[27] M. Rezaee, A.M. Aly, Vibration control in wind turbines to achieve desired system‐level performance under single and multiple hazard loadings, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 25(12) (2018) e2261.
[28] S. Dyke, B. Spencer, A comparison of semi-active control strategies for the MR damper, in:  Proceedings Intelligent Information Systems. IIS'97, IEEE, 1997, pp. 580-584.
[29] S. Dyke, B. Spencer, M. Sain, J. Carlson, Phenomenological model of a magnetorheological damper, J. Eng. Mech. ASCE, 123(3) (1997) 230-238.
[30] A. Yakut, Overview of seismic performance assessment procedures for rc buildings in Turkey,  (2020).
[31] J. Den Hartog, Mechanical Vibrations, (1934), 103, in, McGraw-hill.
[32] S. Mohajernasab, M.A. Dastan Diznab, M.R. Tabeshpour, H. Mehdigholi, M.S. Seif, Application of New-wave theory in the Endurance Wave method to assess offshore structures under the Persian Gulf wave conditions, Journal of Marine Engineering, 9(18) (2014) 71-82.