Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction effects on Seismic Response of Adjacent High-Rise Structures Equipped with Optimized Tuned Mass Damper

Document Type : Research Article


1 Msc. graduated of structural engineering/ University of Zanjan

2 Civil Engineering Group, Engineering Department, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

3 Civil Engineering Group, Engineering Department, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.


Tuned Mass Damper (TMD) is amongst the simplest and, the most usable passive control tools, to improve the behavior of various structures. However, factors such as the characteristics of the soil beneath the structure and the presence of an adjacent structure could also affect the performance of that. This study investigates the effects of using a TMD in two 20-story steel moment frames with two different aspect ratios on the seismic response of them in fixed and flexible bases and considers the adjacency of two structures, known as Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction (SSSI). To apply the effects of SSSI, the reduced stiffness matrix of the foundation-soil-foundation system, considering as a plane strain problem, is obtained through analysis of a finite element model in Abaqus and is applied to the 2D models of the end frame of the structures using a set of springs and a newly developed element in OpenSEES. Furthermore, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is used to optimize the design parameter of TMD. The average results obtained from time history analysis under ten far-field seismic records specifies that, exploiting a TMD with parameters optimized in a 20-story structure in both fixed-base cases and considering SSSI, can reduce the seismic responses in the form of the average of maximum drift and displacement. However, the SSSI effect can change the responses of structures equipped with dampers; in such a way that, in high-rise structures with a higher value of the height to dimension ratio (thinner structure), the response of structures is increased.


Main Subjects

[1] H. Frahm, Device for damping vibrations of bodies, in, Google Patents, 1911.
[2] J. Den Hartog, Mechanical Vibrations (2nd Edition., p. 436), in, New York: McGraw Hill, 1940.
[3] P.H. Wirsching, J.T. Yao, Safety design concepts for seismic structures, Computers & structures, 3(4) (1973) 809-826.
[4] P.H. Wirsching, G.W. Campbell, Minimal structural response under random excitation using the vibration absorber, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2(4) (1973) 303-312.
[5] S. Ohno, Optimum tuning of the dynamic damper to control response of structures to earthquake ground motion, Proc. 6WCEE, (1977).
[6] H.C. Tsai, G.C. Lin, Optimum tuned‐mass dampers for minimizing steady‐state response of support‐excited and damped systems, Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 22(11) (1993) 957-973.
[7] M.N. Hadi, Y. Arfiadi, Optimum design of absorber for MDOF structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, 124(11) (1998) 1272-1280.
[8] A.Y. Leung, H. Zhang, C. Cheng, Y. Lee, Particle swarm optimization of TMD by non‐stationary base excitation during earthquake, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 37(9) (2008) 1223-1246.
[9] M. Domizio, H. Garrido, D. Ambrosini, Single and multiple TMD optimization to control seismic response of nonlinear structures, Engineering Structures, 252 (2022) 113667.
[10] Y. Bozorgnia, K.W. Campbell. The vertical-to-horizontal response spectral ratio and tentative procedures for developing simplified V/H and vertical design spectra, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(02) (2004) 175-207.
[11] M. Trifunac, Scattering of plane SH waves by a semi‐cylindrical canyon, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1(3) (1972) 267-281.
[12] M. Trifunac, Interaction of a shear wall with the soil for incident plane SH waves, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 62(1) (1972) 63-83.
[13] E. Şafak, Wave-propagation formulation of seismic response of multistory buildings, Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(4) (1999) 426-437.
[14] E. Şafak, Local site effects and dynamic soil behavior, Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 21(5) (2001) 453-458.
[15] M.-Y. Liu, W.-L. Chiang, J.-H. Hwang, C.-R. Chu, Wind-induced vibration of high-rise building with tuned mass damper including soil–structure interaction, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 96(6-7) (2008) 1092-1102.
[16] G. Bekdaş, S.M. Nigdeli. Estimating optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers using harmony search, Engineering Structures, 33(9) (2011) 2716-2723.
[17] W. Guo, H.N. Li, G.H. Liu, Z.W. Yu, A simplified optimization strategy for nonlinear tuned mass damper in structural vibration control, Asian Journal of Control, 14(4) (2012) 1059-1069.
[18] M. Mohebbi, A. Joghataie, Designing optimal tuned mass dampers for nonlinear frames by distributed genetic algorithms, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 21(1) (2012) 57-76.
[19] A. Farshidianfar, S. Soheili, Ant colony optimization of tuned mass dampers for earthquake oscillations of high-rise structures including soil–structure interaction, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 51 (2013) 14-22.
[20] R. Jabary, S. Madabhushi, Structure-soil-structure interaction effects on structures retrofitted with tuned mass dampers, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 100 (2017) 301-315.
[21] J. Salvi, E. Rizzi, Optimum earthquake-tuned TMDs: seismic performance and new design concept of balance of split effective modal masses, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 101 (2017) 67-80.
[22] A. Abd-Elhamed, S. Mahmoud, Simulation analysis of TMD controlled building subjected to far-and near-fault records considering soil-structure interaction, Journal of Building Engineering, 26 (2019) 100930.
[23] A. Kaveh, S. Javadi, R.M. Moghanni, Optimal structural control of tall buildings using tuned mass dampers via chaotic optimization algorithm, in:  Structures, Elsevier, 2020, pp. 2704-2713.
[24] L. Wang, W. Shi, Y. Zhou, Adaptive-passive tuned mass damper for structural aseismic protection including soil–structure interaction, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 158 (2022) 107298.
[25] F. McKenna, OpenSees: a framework for earthquake engineering simulation, Computing in Science & Engineering, 13(4) (2011) 58-66.
[26] Abaqus, Dassault Systems Simulia Corporation, Providence, RI, USA. (
[27] A. Gupta, H. Krawinkler, Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures (SAC Task 5.4. 3), John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, 1999.
[28] ISIR 2800, Seismic resistant design of buildings–Code of practice, Standards and Industrial Research of Iran, 2014 (in Persian).
[29] A. Fatollahpour, S.A. Arjmandi, E. Tafakori, Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction (SSSI) effects on seismic response of low-, mid-and high-rise steel moment resisting frame structures, Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering, 54(2) (2022) 605-630.
[30] R.J. Guyan, Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices, AIAA journal, 3(2) (1965) 380-380.
[31] B. Irons, Structural eigenvalue problems-elimination of unwanted variables, AIAA journal, 3(5) (1965) 961-962.
[32] M. Paz, Practical reduction of structural eigenproblems, Journal of Structural Engineering, 109(11) (1983) 2591-2599.
[33] M. Paz, W. Leigh, Integrated matrix analysis of structures: theory and computation, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
[34] A.Y.T. Leung, A simple dynamic substructure method, Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 16(6) (1988) 827-837.
[35] Y.K. Cheung, A.Y. Leung, Finite element methods in dynamics, Springer Science & Business Media, 1992.
[36] Matlab, Mathworks Inc, CA, USA. (
[37] H. Krawinkler, Importance of good nonlinear analysis, The structural design of tall and special buildings, 15(5) (2006) 515-531.
[38] D. Vamvatsikos, M. Fragiadakis, Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty, Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 39(2) (2010) 141-163.
[39] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 2016;7–10. Reston, VA.