Investigation of the behavior of Ahvaz sand soil stabilized with metakaolin

Document Type : Research Article


1 Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University/ Faculty of Civil Engineering

2 Department of Geotechnical Engineering and Water Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University

3 Civil Eng. Dep. Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training Univ. Lavizan. Tehran. Iran


Considering the growth of the population for the development of the country's infrastructure, stabilization and improvement of low-quality land in order to create a strong and resistant base are needed more than ever. So far, many improvement methods have been proposed in the world, which is one of the most common methods of chemical stabilization using lime or cement, which are not compatible with the environment. Therefore, nowadays, the use of pozzolans and geopolymeric cements instead of Portland cement has attracted the attention of various researchers. In this study, the stabilization of sandy soil in Ahvaz City with the help of metakaolin as an additive has been investigated. In this research, the effect of different amounts of variables such as the percentage of metakaolin, the ratio of sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide, the concentration of sodium hydroxide, and the ratio of alkaline activator solution to the additive at the curing ages of 7 and 28 days have been discussed. Samples are subjected to unconfined uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) evaluation and microstructural investigation, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses are used. The results of this research show that in order to achieve optimal resistance, it is necessary to mix 20% metakaolin, the ratio of sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide is 2.5, the concentration of sodium hydroxide is 12 Molar, and the ratio of activator solution to additive is 0.5. The strength of the sample with 28-day curing reaches about 5 MPa, which is about 3 times more than cement samples and 23 times more than unstabilized soil, which can be seen in the microstructural analysis of the presence of N-A-S-H gel as the main factor in increasing the strength in the geopolymerization process.


Main Subjects

[1] R. Rehan, M. Nehdi, Carbon dioxide emissions and climate change: policy implications for the cement industry, Environmental Science & Policy, 8(2) (2005) 105-114.
[2] F. Gouny, F. Fouchal, O. Pop, P. Maillard, S. Rossignol, Mechanical behavior of an assembly of wood–geopolymer–earth bricks, Construction and Building Materials, 38 (2013) 110-118.
[3] A. Pappu, V.K. Thakur, R. Patidar, S.R. Asolekar, M. Saxena, Recycling marble wastes and Jarosite wastes into sustainable hybrid composite materials and validation through Response Surface Methodology, Journal of Cleaner Production, 240 (2019) 118249.
[4] K.L. Scrivener, R.J. Kirkpatrick, Innovation in use and research on cementitious material, Cement and concrete research, 38(2) (2008) 128-136.
[5] R.M. Andrew, Global CO 2 emissions from cement production, Earth System Science Data, 10(1) (2018) 195-217.
[6] M.E. Alouani, S. Alehyen, M.E. Achouri, A. Hajjaji, C. Ennawaoui, M.h. Taibi, Influence of the Nature and Rate of Alkaline Activator on the Physicochemical Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers, Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020 (2020).
[7] D. Higgins, Briefing: GGBS and sustainability, in, Thomas Telford Ltd, 2007.
[8] G. Vijayakumar, H. Vishaliny, D. Govindarajulu, Studies on glass powder as partial replacement of cement in concrete production, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3(2) (2013) 153-157.
[9] J. Davidovits, False values on CO2 emission for geopolymer cement/concrete published in scientific papers, Technical paper, 24 (2015) 1-9.
[10] M. Abdullah, L.Y. Ming, H.C. Yong, M. Tahir, Clay-based materials in geopolymer technology, Cement Based Materials, 239 (2018).
[11] A.K. Thakur, A. Pappu, V.K. Thakur, Resource efficiency impact on marble waste recycling towards sustainable green construction materials, Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 13 (2018) 91-101.
[12] T.A. Garcí, M. de Lourdes Chávez-Garcí, Compressive strength of metakaolin-based geopolymers: influence of koh concentration, temperature, time and relative humidity, Materials Sciences and Applications, 7(11) (2016) 772-791.
[13] A.L. Wijaya, J.J. Ekaputri, Factors influencing strength and setting time of fly ash based-geopolymer paste, in:  MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 2017, pp. 01010.
[14] A. Nazari, H. Khanmohammadi, M. Amini, H. Hajiallahyari, A. Rahimi, Production geopolymers by Portland cement: designing the main parameters’ effects on compressive strength by Taguchi method, Materials & Design, 41 (2012) 43-49.
[15] P. Duxson, A. Fernández-Jiménez, J.L. Provis, G.C. Lukey, A. Palomo, J.S. van Deventer, Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art, Journal of materials science, 42(9) (2007) 2917-2933.
[16] S. Andini, R. Cioffi, F. Colangelo, T. Grieco, F. Montagnaro, L. Santoro, Coal fly ash as raw material for the manufacture of geopolymer-based products, Waste management, 28(2) (2008) 416-423.
[17] J.L. Provis, S.A. Bernal, Geopolymers and related alkali-activated materials, Annual Review of Materials Research, 44 (2014) 299-327.
[18] A. Palomo, M. Grutzeck, M. Blanco, Alkali-activated fly ashes: A cement for the future, Cement and concrete research, 29(8) (1999) 1323-1329.
[19] D. Hardjito, S.E. Wallah, D.M. Sumajouw, B.V. Rangan, On the development offly ash-based geopolymer concrete, Materials Journal, 101(6) (2004) 467-472.
[20] C. Shi, R.L. Day, Chemical activation of blended cements made with lime and natural pozzolans, Cement and Concrete Research, 23(6) (1993) 1389-1396.
[21] Á. Palomo, E. Kavalerova, A. Fernández-Jiménez, P. Krivenko, I. García-Lodeiro, O. Maltseva, A review on alkaline activation: new analytical perspectives,  (2015).
[22] J.L. Provis, J.S.J. Van Deventer, Geopolymers: structures, processing, properties and industrial applications, Elsevier, 2009.
[23] P. Sargent, P.N. Hughes, M. Rouainia, M.L. White, The use of alkali activated waste binders in enhancing the mechanical properties and durability of soft alluvial soils, Engineering geology, 152(1) (2013) 96-108.
[24] M. Bellotto, A. Gualtieri, G. Artioli, S. Clark, Kinetic study of the kaolinite-mullite reaction sequence. Part I: kaolinite dehydroxylation, Physics and chemistry of minerals, 22(4) (1995) 207-217.
[25] L.R. Caballero, M.d.D.M. Paiva, E.d.M.R. Fairbairn, R.D. Toledo, Thermal, mechanical and microstructural analysis of metakaolin based geopolymers, Materials Research, 22 (2019).
[26] H. Xu, J. Van Deventer, Geopolymerisation of multiple minerals. vol. 15, Miner Eng,  (2002) 00255-00258.
[27] M. Woodbridge, Use of soft limestone for road-base construction in Belize, Transportation research record, 1652(1) (1999) 181-191.
[28] S.G. Maryam Alizadeh, Ali Almasi, Basics of sample preparation for scanning electron microscope, in:  Iranian Journal Of Laboratory Knowledge, 1392. (In Persian)
[29] A.H.b. Somaye Mirjalili, The process of implementing a quality management system based on ISO/IEC 17025 in testing laboratories, Iranian Journal Of Laboratory Knowledge,  (1394).In Persian)
[30] Y. Nazir, S. Shuib, M.S. Kalil, Y. Song, A.A. Hamid, Optimization of culture conditions for enhanced growth, lipid and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) production of Aurantiochytrium SW1 by response surface methodology, Scientific reports, 8(1) (2018) 1-12.
[31] B. Aouan, S. Alehyen, M. Fadil, M.E. Alouani, A. Khabbazi, A. Atbir, M.h. Taibi, Compressive strength optimization of metakaolin‐based geopolymer by central composite design, Chemical Data Collections, 31 (2021) 100636.
[32] A. Arulrajah, M. Yaghoubi, M.M. Disfani, S. Horpibulsuk, M.W. Bo, M. Leong, Evaluationof fly ash-and slag-based geopolymers for the improvement of a soft marine clay by deep soil mixing, Soils and foundations, 58(6) (2018) 1358-1370.
[33] H. Jiang, Z. Qi, E. Yilmaz, J. Han, J. Qiu, C. Dong, Effectiveness of alkali-activated slag as alternative binder on workability and early age compressive strength of cemented paste backfills, Construction and Building Materials, 218 (2019) 689-700.
[34] S. Hanjitsuwan, S. Hunpratub, P. Thongbai, S. Maensiri, V. Sata, P. Chindaprasirt, Effects of NaOH concentrations on physical and electrical properties of high calcium fly ash geopolymer paste, Cement and Concrete Composites, 45 (2014) 9-14.
[35] A. Hameed, R. Rawdhan, S. Al-Mishhadani, Effect of various factors on the manufacturing of geopolymer mortar, Archives of Science, 1(3) (2017) 1-8.
[36] H. Xu, J. Van Deventer, The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals, International journal of mineral processing, 59(3) (2000) 247-266.
[37] C. Villa, E.T. Pecina, R. Torres, L. Gómez, Geopolymer synthesisusing alkaline activation of natural zeolite, Construction and Building Materials, 24(11) (2010) 2084-2090.
[38] H.A. Gasteiger, W.J. Frederick, R.C. Streisel, Solubility of aluminosilicates in alkaline solutions and a thermodynamic equilibrium model, Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 31(4) (1992) 1183-1190.
[39] G.S. Ryu, Y.B. Lee, K.T. Koh, Y.S. Chung, The mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete with alkaline activators, Construction and building materials, 47 (2013) 409-418.
[40] A. Sathonsaowaphak, P. Chindaprasirt, K. Pimraksa, Workability and strength of lignite bottom ash geopolymer mortar, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 168(1) (2009) 44-50.
[41] S. Alonso, A. Palomo, Alkaline activation of metakaolin and calcium hydroxide mixtures: influence of temperature, activator concentration and solids ratio, Materials Letters, 47(1-2) (2001) 55-62.
[42] P. Chindaprasirt, C. Jaturapitakkul, W. Chalee, U. Rattanasak, Comparative study on the characteristics of fly ash and bottom ash geopolymers, Waste management, 29(2) (2009) 539-543.
[43] A. Palomo, M.T. Blanco-Varela, M. Granizo, F. Puertas, T. Vazquez, M. Grutzeck, Chemical stability of cementitious materials based on metakaolin, Cement and Concrete research, 29(7) (1999) 997-1004.
[44] A. Mustafa Al Bakri, O.A. Abdulkareem, H. Kamarudin, I. Khairul Nizar, R. Abd Razak, Y. Zarina, A. Alida, Microstructure studies on the effect of the alkaline activators of fly ash-based geopolymer at elevated heat treatment temperature, in:  Applied Mechanics and Materials, Trans Tech Publ, 2013, pp. 342-348.
[45] M. Ibrahim, M.A.M. Johari, M.K. Rahman, M. Maslehuddin, Effect of alkaline activators and binder content on the properties of natural pozzolan-based alkali activated concrete, Construction and building materials, 147 (2017) 648-660.
[46] A. Fernández-Jiménez, A. Palomo, Characterisation of fly ashes. Potential reactivity as alkaline cements☆, Fuel, 82(18) (2003) 2259-2265.
[47] M. Choquette, M.-A. Berube, J. Locat, Behavior of common rock-forming minerals in a strongly basic NaOH solution, The Canadian Mineralogist, 29(1) (1991) 163-173.
[48] P. Palmero, A. Formia, P. Antonaci, S. Brini, J.-M. Tulliani, Geopolymer technology for application-oriented dense and lightened materials. Elaboration and characterization, Ceramics International, 41(10) (2015) 12967-12979.
[49] A. Palomo, F. Glasser, Chemically-bonded cementitious materials based on metakaolin, British ceramic. Transactions and journal, 91(4) (1992) 107-112.
[50] H. Rahier, B. Van Mele, M. Biesemans, J. Wastiels, X. Wu, Low-temperature synthesized aluminosilicate glasses, Journal of materials science, 31(1) (1996) 71-79.
[51] M. Zhang, H. Guo, T. El-Korchi, G. Zhang, M. Tao, Experimental feasibility study of geopolymer as the next-generation soil stabilizer, Construction and building materials, 47 (2013) 1468-1478.
[52] M. Yang, Y. Zheng, X. Li, X. Yang, F. Rao, L. Zhong, Durability of alkali-activated materials with different C–S–H and NASH gels in acid and alkaline environment, Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 16 (2022) 619-630.