The effects of wind load direction changes on offshore wind turbine monopile response

Document Type : Research Article


1 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Isfahan, Iran

2 Depatrment of Civil Engineering, University of Isfahan, Iran

3 Department of civil engineering and transportation, University of Isfahan, Iran


Monopile is the most common type of foundation for onshore and offshore wind turbines. As the wind blows in different directions, wind load alternately applies in different directions during the life cycle of the wind turbine. In this paper, the influence of the alternating change of wind load direction on the response of wind turbine piles is studied. The functional performance of the soil-pile system is simulated with a bounding surface soil behavior model presented by Dafaliad-Manzari that is implemented in FLAC3D software. The softening and hardening effects of soils due to cyclic load patterns are incorporated into the model in a convenient manner. The results show that in monopiles, alternative change in the direction of loading results in the decrease in the maximum horizontal displacement and rotation up to 16% in comparison with the uni-directional loading mode. This difference in vertical displacement is about 100%. Residual displacement and rotation in the horizontal direction also decrease 13% and 18%, respectively. Alternating change of loading causes upward moves of the monopile; the pile moves upward from its original level. In general, the change of loading direction causes a significant change in the pile response, although the values of this difference vary in different parameters and for altered loading modes.


Main Subjects

[1] K. Sunday and F. Brennan, A review of offshore wind monopiles structural design achievements and challenges, Ocean Engineering, 235 (2021).
[2] Yung-Yen Ko, A simplified structural model for monopile-supported offshore wind turbines with tapered towers, Renewable Energy, (2020), 777- 790.
[3] S.Bhattacharya, Design of Foundations for OffshoreWind Turbines, Wiley, University of Surrey, UK, 2019.
[4] Y. Yamada, K. Ishihara, Anisotropic deformation characteristics of sand under three dimentional stress conditions, Soils Found, 19(2) (Nov. 1980).
[5] K. Ishihara, F. Yamazaki, Cyclic simple shear tests on saturated sand in multidirectional loading, Soils Found, 20(1) (apr. 1980) 45-59.
[6] H. Matsuda, H. Shinozaki, N. Okada, Effects of multi-directional cyclic shear on the post-earthquake settlement of ground, in:  13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August 1- 6, 2004.
[7] A.P. Institute, Recommended Practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms-working stress design: API recommended practice 2A-WSD (RP2A-WSD), 21th ed, in, Dallas, 2000.
[8] Q. Zhang, Y. Zhang, H. Lin, L. Feng, Numerical investigation on bearing capacity of OWT foundation with large diameter monopile under Seismic load, Applied Ocean Research, 108 (2021).
[9] M. Achmus, K. Abdel-Rahman, Finite element modelling of horizontally loaded monopile foundations for offshore wind energy converters in Germany, in: Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering, University of Hannover, Germany, 2005.
[10] S.-H. Chong, C. Pasten, Numerical study on long-term monopile foundation response, Mar. Georesources Geotechnol, 36(2) (Feb. 2018) 190-196.
[11] M. Yang, G. Seidalinov, M. Taiebat, Multidirectional cyclic shearing of clays and sands: Evaluation of two bounding surface plasticity models, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, (Jun. 2018) 1-29.
[12] Z. Cheng, Y.F. Dafalias, M.T. Manzari, Application of SANISAND Dafalias-Manzari model in FLAC 3D, Continuum and Distinct Element Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics, (Nov 2013).
[13] H. M.A, Numerical and constitutive modeling of monotonic and cyclic loading in varialy saturated soils, School of civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, (2006).
[14] Y.F. Dafalias, E.P. Popov, A model of nonlinearly hardening materials for complex loading, Acta Mechanica, 21(3) (1975) 173–192.
[15] Z. Mroz, V.A. Norris, O.C. Zienkiewicz, An anisotropic hardening model for soils and its application to cycle loading, International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics, 2 (1978) 203-222.
[16] Y.F. Dafalias, L.R. Herrmann, Bounding Surface Formulation of Soil Plasticity, Soil Mechanics—Transient and Cyclic Loads, G. Pande and O. C. Zienkiewicz, Eds., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., London, U.K.,  (1982) 253- 282.
[17] M.T. Manzari, Y.F. Dafalias, A critical state two-surface plasticity model for sands, Géotechnique, 47(2) (1997) 255–272.
[18] Y.F. Dafalias, M.T. Manzari, Simple Plasticity Sand Model Accounting for Fabric Change Effects, J. Eng. Mech, 130(6) (2004) 622–634.
[19] M. Hamidreza, M. Hassanlourad, R.M. Salout, Investigation of Carbonate Sand Shear Behavior Based on Manzari anid Dafalias Behavioral Model, Amirkabir J. Civil Eng, 51(4) (2019) 201-204, (in persian).
[20] M. Zarean, Study on OWT's monopile foundation under multi-directional cyclic lateral load, University of Isfahan, 2020, (in persian).
[21] I.F. Møller, T. Christiansen, T.H. Christiansen, Laterally Loaded Monopile in Dry and Saturated Sand - Static and Cyclic Loading Experimental and Numerical Studies, Master Project, Aalborg University Esbjerg, 2011.
[22] H. Seyfi, A. Fakher, a local study on lateral response of monopile located in PARS-ASSALUYE petrochemical port, in: 9th marin industtries conference of mazandaran, 2007, (in persian).
[23] I.E. Commission, International Standard IEC-61400-1 Wind Turbines - Part 1: Design requirement, Third Edition, in, 2005.