Document Type : Research Article

**Authors**

University of Qom

**Abstract**

The inconveniences of introducing and modifying the mesh grids in mesh-based numerical methods lead the researchers to meshfree methods, among which the RBF methods are probably the most interesting and powerful ones. In this research, the numerical solution of the steady-state incompressible continuity and Navier–Stokes equations, and the standard k-Ɛ turbulence model was investigated in a 2D domain. The computational domain consisting of a 0.5 m×0.5 m square lid-driven cavity was analyzed for five Reynolds numbers of 2.5×10^{5}, 5×10^{5},_{ }10×10^{5}, 2×10^{6}, and 5.5×10^{6}. The Multiquadric Radial Basis Function (MQ-RBF), as the most successful RBF, was employed with 36 and 121 domain computational nodes to solve the PDEs. The velocity fields in two directions, the static pressure, the turbulent kinetic energy and the turbulent energy dissipation, were computed. A try–and–error algorithm was used for solving a set of non-linear equations, and the optimal values of the shape parameter *c* and the *λ* set coefficients were evaluated and discussed for each flow field. According to the results, assuming the independence of the values of the shape parameter *c* for each flow field at different Reynolds numbers, a predictable pattern can be obtained for the *λ* set for different Reynolds’ numbers in the studied range. These patterns with the predictor functions of the flow fields were compared to existing benchmark results of the finite volume method (ANSYS Fluent). The Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients of 93-99% and RRSME of about %1 obtained from this comparison indicated the reasonable accuracy of the assumption concerning the independence of the shape parameter *c* of the Reynolds’ numbers, the repeatable patterns of the normalized *λ* set, and polynomial predictor functions in the MQRBF method for each flow field.

**Keywords**

**Main Subjects**

[1] R. Franke, Scattered data interpolation: tests of some methods, Mathematics of computation, 38(157) (1982) 181-200.

[2] R. L. Hardy, Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces, Journal of geophysical research, 76(8) (1971) 1905-1915.

[3] R. Marinova, C. Christov, T. Marinov, A fully coupled solver for incompressible Navier–Stokes equations using operator splitting, International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 17(5) (2003) 371-385.

[4] N. Wright, P. Gaskell, An efficient multigrid approach to solving highly recirculating flows, Computers & Fluids, 24(1) (1995) 63-79.

[5] Z. Brzeźniak, E. Carelli, A. Prohl, Finite-element-based discretizations of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations with multiplicative random forcing, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 33(3) (2013) 771-824.

[6] K. Poochinapan, Numerical implementations for 2D lid-driven cavity flow in stream function formulation, ISRN Applied Mathematics, 2012 (2012).

[7] M. Shirazaki, G. Yagawa, Large-scale parallel flow analysis based on free mesh method: a virtually meshless method, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 174(3-4) (1999) 419-431.

[8] U. Ghia, K.N. Ghia, C. Shin, High-Re solutions for incompressible flow using the Navier-Stokes equations and a multigrid method, Journal of computational physics, 48(3) (1982) 387-411.

[9] S. Rubin, P. Khosla, Polynomial interpolation methods for viscous flow calculations, Journal of Computational Physics, 24(3) (1977) 217-244.

[10] C. Wang, Characteristic finite analytic method (CFAM) for incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, Acta Mechanica, 143(1-2) (2000) 57-66.

[11] R. Kupferman, A central-difference scheme for a pure stream function formulation of incompressible viscous flow, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 23(1) (2001) 1-18.

[12] X.-H. Wu, W.-Q. Tao, S.-P. Shen, X.-W. Zhu, A stabilized MLPG method for steady state incompressible fluid flow simulation, Journal of Computational Physics, 229(22) (2010) 8564-8577.

[13] E.J. Kansa, Multiquadrics—A scattered data approximation scheme with applications to computational fluid-dynamics—I surface approximations and partial derivative estimates, Computers & Mathematics with applications, 19(8-9) (1990) 127-145.

[14] A.R. Firoozjaee, M.H. Afshar, Steady‐state solution of incompressible Navier–Stokes equations using discrete least‐squares meshless method, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 67(3) (2011) 369-382.

[15] G. Bourantas, E. Skouras, V. Loukopoulos, G. Nikiforidis, Numerical solution of non-isothermal fluid flows using local radial basis functions (LRBF) interpolation and a velocity-correction method, Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 64(2) (2010) 187-212.

[16] N. Mai‐Duy, T. Tran‐Cong, Numerical solution of Navier–Stokes equations using multiquadric radial basis function networks, International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 37(1) (2001) 65-86.

[17] P.P. Chinchapatnam, K. Djidjeli, P.B. Nair, Radial basis function meshless method for the steady incompressible Navier–Stokes equations, International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 84(10) (2007) 1509-1521.

[18] P.P. Chinchapatnam, K. Djidjeli, P. Nair, M. Tan, A compact RBF-FD based meshless method for the incompressible Navier—Stokes equations, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 223(3) (2009) 275-290.

[19] Z.H. Wang, Z. Huang, W. Zhang, G. Xi, A meshless local radial basis function method for two-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals, 67(4) (2015) 320-337.

[20] E.J. Sellountos, A. Sequeira, An advanced meshless LBIE/RBF method for solving two-dimensional incompressible fluid flows, Computational Mechanics, 41(5) (2008) 617-631.

[21] A. Fallah, E. Jabbari, R. Babaee, Development of the Kansa method for solving seepage problems using a new algorithm for the shape parameter optimization, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 77(3) (2019) 815-829.

[22] M. Kooshki, R. Babaee, E. Jabbari, Application of RBF multiquadric method for solving seepage problems using a new algorithm for optimization of the shape parameter, Amirkabir Civil Engineering Journal (accepted for publication) doi: 10.22060/CEEJ.2019.15155.5840.

[23] R. Babaee, E. Jabbari, M. Eskandari-Ghadi, Application of Multiquadric Radial Basis Function method for Helmholtz equation in seismic wave analysis for reservoir of rigid dams, Amirkabir Civil Engineering Journal (accepted for publication) doi: 10.22060/CEEJ.2019.16443.6230.

[24] S. Patel, A. Rastogi, Meshfree multiquadric solution for real field large heterogeneous aquifer system, Water Resources Management, 31(9) (2017) 2869-2884.

[25] M.F.Harris, A.J. Kassab, E. Divo, A shock-capturing meshless scheme using RBF blended interpolation and moving least squares, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 109 (2019), 81-93.

[26] N. Sheikhi, M. Najafi, V. Enjilela, Extending the Meshless Local Petrov–Galerkin Method to Solve Stabilized Turbulent Fluid Flow Problems, International Journal of Computational Methods, 16(1) (2019).

[27] H. Kahid Basiri, R. Babaee, A.R. Fallah, E. Jabbari, Development of multiquadric meshless method for solving dam-break problem, Journal of Hydraulics, 14(4) (2020), 83-98.

[28] M. Koushki, E. Jabbari, M. Ahmadinia, Evaluating RBF methods for solving PDEs using Padua points distribution, Alexandria Engineering Journal , 59 (2020), 2999-3018.

[29] M. Despotovic, V. Nedic, D. Despotovic, S. Cvetanovic, Evaluation of empirical models for predicting monthly mean, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56 (2016) 246-260.