FEMA-350. Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-frame Buildings, (2013).
 Z. Rahmani, M. Naghipour, J. Vaseghi Amiri, and R. Karimnezhad, Comparing Seismic Parameters in Dual Systems Equipped with Concentric and Eccentric Braces and Side Plate Connection, Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(3) (2013) 300-308.
 A. Deylami, and M. Yakhchalian. Comparison between" Common Moment Connection" and Moment Connection with Side Plates for Double-I Built-up Columns. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, (2008).
 C.C. Chou, K.C.Tsai, Y.Y. Wang, and C.K. Jao, Seismic rehabilitation performance of steel side plate moment connections. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 39(1) (2010) 23-44.
 A. Deylami, and M. Shiravand, The Experimental Study on Moment Connection of Beam to Double I Column Using Full Depth Side Plates. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, (2008).
 Faridmehr, M.H. Osman, M. Bin Md Tahir, A. Farokhi Nejad, and R. Hodjati, Seismic and progressive collapse assessment of SidePlate moment connection system, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 54(2015) 35-54.
 S. Alizadeh, G.A. MacRae, D. Bull, and G.C. Clifton, (2018). Beam Web-Side-Plate Connection Axial Performance. Key Engineering Materials, 763, 174-181.
 C. Cismasiu, and F.P.A. Dos Santos. Numerical simulation of a semi-active vibration control device based on superelastic shape memory alloy wires: INTECH Open Access Publisher, (2010).
 A. Abolmaali, J. Treadway, P. Aswath, F. K. Lu, and E. McCarthy. Hysteresis behavior of t-stub connections with superelastic shape memory fasteners, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (2006) 831-838.
 B.R. Ellingwood, B. Taftali, and R. DesRoches. Seismic performance assessment of steel frames with shape memory alloy connections, Part II–Probabilistic seismic demand assessment, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 14 (2010) 631-645.
 M. S. Speicher, R. DesRoches, and R. T. Leon. Experimental results of a NiTi shape memory alloy (SMA)-based recentering beam-column connection, Engineering Structures, 33 (2011) 2448-2457.
 C. Fang, M. C. Yam, A. C. Lam, and L. Xie. Cyclic performance of extended end-plate connections equipped with shape memory alloy bolts, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 94 (2014) 122-136.
 W. Wang, T.-M. Chan, H. Shao, and Y. Chen, Cyclic behavior of connections equipped with NiTi shape memory alloy and steel tendons between H-shaped beam to CHS column, Engineering Structures, 88 (2015) 37-50.
 Shen, O. Seker, B. Akbas, P. Seker, S.B. Momenzadeh, and M. Faytarouni, Seismic performance of concentrically braced frames with and without brace buckling, Engineering Structures
 Q. Canxing, Z. Yichen, L. Han Q. Bing, H, Hetao, and T. Li, Seismic performance of Concentrically Braced Frames with non-buckling braces, Engineering Structures
 M. A. Farmani and M. Ghassemieh. Steel beam-to-column connections equipped with SMA tendons and energy dissipating devices including shear tabs or web hourglass pins, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 135 (2017) 30-48.
 M. Pouraminian, S. Hashemi, A. Sadeghi, and S. Pourbakhshian, Probabilistic Assessment the Seismic Collapse Capacity of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames Equipped with Shape Memory Alloys. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, (2020). Doi: 10.22065/jsce.2020.236804.2174.
 Abaqus, Abaqus/standard. Version 6.11, ABAQUS, Inc., Pawtucket, R.I, (2012).
 F. Auricchio, D. Fugazza, and R. DesRoches, A 1D rate-dependent viscous constitutive model for superelastic shape-memory alloys: formulation and comparison with experimental data. Smart Mater Struct. 16(1) (2007).
 MATLAB (matrix laboratory), Multi paradigm numerical computing environment and proprietary programming language developed by Math Works, (2013). https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab