Investigation of sediment transport Pattern and beach morphology in the vicinity of submerged groyne

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. Student, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Guilan

2 Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Guilan

3 Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Guilan

Abstract

Groynes are one of the most prominent structures that are used in shore protection to control the littoral
sediment transportation. This structure can be used submerged providing the necessary beach protection
without negative aesthetic impact. Although submerged structures adopt for beach protection, the
shoreline’s response to these structures is not well understood at present. The objective of this study is
to predict sediment transport in the vicinity of submerged groyne and comparison with non-submerged
groyne with focus on a part of the coast at Dahane Sar Sefidrood, Guilan Province, Iran where serious
coast erosion has occurred. The simulations were obtained using a one-line model, in this paper; a linear
model is presented to estimate shoreline deformation in the presence of these structures. The results of
the present study show that using submerged groyne can have a good efficiency to control the sediment
and beach erosion without causing severe environmental impact to the coast. The important outcome
from this study may be employed in optimum design of groyne systems in marine projects. Comparison
of the predicted results with those obtained through field measurements shows the efficiency of the
proposed model.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]Uno, Y.; Goda, Y. and Ono, N.; “Suspended-Sediment-based Beach Morphology Model Applied to Submerged Groin System,” Coastal Engineering Proceedings, Miami, USA, Vol. 1, No. 32, p. 52, 2011.
[2]Ozolcer, I. H. and Komurcu, M. I.; “Effects of Straight Groin Parameters on Amount of Accretion,” Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 173–182, 2007.
[3]Ranasinghe, R. and Turner, I. L.; “Shoreline Response to Submerged Structures: A Review,” Costal Engineering Journal, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 65–79, 2006.
[4]Aminti, P. L.; Cammelli, C.; Cipriani, L. E. and Pranzini, E.; “Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Submerged Groin as Soft Shore Protection,” 1st Conference of Soft Shore Protection, Patras, Greece, pp. 151–158, 2001.
[5]Aminti, P. J.; Cappietti, L.; D’Elso, C. and Mori, E.; “Numerical Simulation of an Experimental Submerged Groin System,” Coastal Structures, 5th International Conference, Venice, World Scientific, pp. 1511–1519, 2009.
[6]Ozolcer, I. H.; Komurcu, M. I.; Birben, A. R.; Yuksek, O. and Karasu, S.; “Effects of T-shape Groin Parameters on Beach Accretion,” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 382–403, 2006.
[7]Miller, J. K. and Dean, R. G.; “A Simple New Shore-line Change Model,” Coastal Engineering, Vol. 51, No. 7, pp. 531–556, 2004.
[8]Mohanty, P. K.; Patra, S. K.; Bramha, S.; Seth, B.; Pradhan, U.; Behera, U. and Panda, B.; “Impact of Groins on Beach Morphology: A Case Study Near Gopalpur Port, East Coast of India,” Journal of Coastal Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 132–142, 2012.
[9]Iran Port and Maritime Organization; “General Directorate of Coast and Port Engineering Iranian Sea Wave Modeling (ISWM),” Vol. 2, Caspian Sea, 2003.
[10]National Cartographic Center of Iran; “Hydrographic Information for Dahane Sar Sefidroud,” From 1991 to 2010 (in Persian).
[11]U.S. Army Coastal Engineering Research Center; “Shore Protection Manual,” Corps. of Engineers, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Department of the Army, Washington DC, USA, Vols. 1‑2, 2006.
[12]Kamphuis, J. W.; “Alongshore Sediment Transport Rate,” Journl of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 117, No. 6, pp. 624–640, 1991.
[13]Considere, P. R.; “Theory of the Evolution of the Forms of Ravage in Sand and Pebble Beaches,” Societe Hydro Technique de France, I Verne Joumtes de L’Hydraulique, Question III, Rapport I, pp. 289–298, 1956.
[14]U.S. Army Corps of Engineering; “Shore Protection Manual,” Coastal Engineering Research Center, Washington D.C, 1992.
[15]Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI); “MIKE 21 User Guide and Reference Manual,” Denmark, 2007.