[1] J. W. Weltevreden, “B2c e‐commerce logistics: the rise of collection‐and‐ delivery points in The Netherlands,” International journal of retail & distribution management, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 638-660, 2008.
[2] Hwang, J., Kim, D., & Kim, J. Public acceptance of autonomous delivery robots in urban areas: Evidence from a large-scale survey in South Korea. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 156, 2022, pp. 1-14.
[3] Jiang, H., & Ren, L. Consumer acceptance of autonomous delivery robots in China: An empirical study based on UTAUT model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 2022, pp. 102867.
[4] Nguyen, T. T., & Tran, Q. T. Exploring factors affecting consumer acceptance of autonomous delivery robots in Vietnam. Heliyon, 8(4), 2022, pp. e09234.
[5] Smith, A., & Anderson, M. Consumer attitudes towards autonomous delivery robots in the UK: A qualitative study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 2022, pp. 102756.
[6] Müller, J., & Voigt, K. I. Acceptance of autonomous delivery robots in Germany: An empirical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, 2023, pp. 131123.
[7] Zhou, L., & Wang, T. Consumer acceptance of autonomous delivery services: An empirical study in the United States. Journal of Business Research, 142, 2022, pp. 123-134.
[8] Ryu, H., & Kim, S. Public acceptance of autonomous delivery services in South Korea: An application of the extended TAM. Telematics and Informatics, 65, 2022, pp. 101729.
[9] S. Kapser, and M. Abdelrahman, “Acceptance of autonomous delivery vehicles for last-mile delivery in Germany–Extending UTAUT2 with risk perceptions,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 111, pp. 210- 225, 2020.
[10] Lee, S., & Park, Y. Understanding public perception of autonomous delivery robots: Evidence from a survey in Singapore. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 38(5), 2022, pp. 421-432.
[11] Tan, G. W. H., & Ooi, K. B. Acceptance of autonomous delivery robots in Malaysia: An extension of the UTAUT model. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(4), 2023, pp. 789-805.
[12] Kumar, S., & Singh, R. Factors influencing consumer acceptance of autonomous delivery robots: A study in the Indian context. Technology in Society, 72, 2023, pp. 102123.
[13] Li, Y., & Huang, J. Public perception and acceptance of autonomous delivery robots in Canada: A mixed-methods study. Technology in Society, 74, 2023, pp. 102234.
[14] Xu, Z., & Li, H. Public acceptance of autonomous delivery robots: Evidence from a survey in Australia. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 144, 2023, pp. 103882.
[15] Shin, D. H., & Lee, W. Understanding the adoption of autonomous delivery robots: A modified UTAUT2 approach. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 2023, pp. 122084.
[16] Yang, S., & Lee, H. Understanding consumer acceptance of autonomous delivery robots: An extension of the TAM model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 2022, pp. 102721.
[17] Park, E., & Kim, K. J. Determinants of user acceptance of autonomous delivery robots: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 2023, pp. 107563.
[18] Chen, H., & Zhang, Y. Factors influencing consumer acceptance of autonomous delivery robots in Taiwan: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, 2023, pp. 107589.
[19] Zhang, X., & Zhao, J. Factors affecting public acceptance of autonomous delivery robots in urban China. Cities, 132, 2023, pp. 104024.
[20] S. Kapser, M. Abdelrahman, and T. Bernecker, “Autonomous delivery vehicles to fight the spread of Covid-19–How do men and women differ in their acceptance?,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 148, pp. 183-198, 2021.
[21] K. F. Yuen, L. Y. Koh, M. H. D. B. Anwar, and X. Wang, “Acceptance of autonomous delivery robots in urban cities,” Cities, vol. 131, pp. 104056, 2022.
[22] Edrisi, A., & Ganjipour, H. (2022). Factors affecting intention and attitude toward sidewalk autonomous delivery robots among online shoppers. Transportation planning and technology, 45(7), 588-609.
]23[.کاظمی، احمد و سالاری، فهیمه و خداپرست، مریم،1403،اتوماسیون و رباتیک در انبارداری و لجستیک،سومین کنفرانس ملی مدیریت و مهندسی کیفیت و قابلیت اتکاء،تهران،https://civilica.com/doc/2156455
]24[.گنجیپور، هومان، و ادریسی، علی. (۱۴۰۱). ارائه مدل گسترشیافته فعالسازی هنجار برای بررسی پذیرش ربات کالارسان بهعنوان روشی سبز برای ارسال کالا. نشریه مهندسی حملونقل، ۱۳(۳)، ۱۸۱۳–۱۷۹۷.
[25] F. D. Davis, “A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end[1]user information systems: Theory and results,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985.
[26] F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models,” Management science, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982-1003, 1989.
[27] V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS quarterly, pp. 425-478, 2003.
[28] V. Venkatesh, J. Y. Thong, and X. Xu, “Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology,” MIS quarterly, pp. 157-178, 2012.
[29] K. Tamilmani, N. P. Rana, N. Prakasam, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “The battle of Brain vs. Heart: A literature review and meta-analysis of “hedonic motivation” use in UTAUT2,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 46, pp. 222-235, 2019.
[30] R. P. Bagozzi, “The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift,” Journal of the association for information systems, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 3, 2007.
[31] I. Ajzen, "From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior," Action control: From cognition to behavior, pp. 11-39: Springer, 1985.
[32] E. L. Slade, Y. K. Dwivedi, N. C. Piercy, and M. D. Williams, “Modeling consumers’ adoption intentions of remote mobile payments in the United Kingdom: extending UTAUT with innovativeness, risk, and trust,” Psychology & marketing, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 860-873, 2015.
[33] S. Heidenreich, P. Spieth, and M. Petschnig, “Ready, steady, green: Examining the effectiveness of external policies to enhance the adoption of eco‐friendly innovations,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 343-359, 2017.
[34] W. R. King, and J. He, “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model,” Information & management, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 740-755, 2006.
[35] Y. K. Dwivedi, N. P. Rana, A. Jeyaraj, M. Clement, and M. D. Williams, “Re[1]examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 21, pp. 719-734, 2019.
[36] P. Legris, J. Ingham, and P. Collerette, “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model,” Information & management, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 191-204, 2003.
[37] A. Tarhini, N. A. G. Arachchilage, and M. S. Abbasi, “A critical review of theories and models of technology adoption and acceptance in information system research,” International Journal of Technology Diffusion (IJTD), vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 58-77, 2015.
[38] K.-P. Wiedmann, N. Hennigs, L. Pankalla, M. Kassubek, and B. Seegebarth, “Adoption barriers and resistance to sustainable solutions in the automotive sector,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 1201-1206, 2011.
[39] H. H. Bauer, T. Reichardt, S. J. Barnes, and M. M. Neumann, “Driving consumer acceptance of mobile marketing: A theoretical framework and empirical study,” Journal of electronic commerce research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 181, 2005.
[40] M. S. Featherman, and P. A. Pavlou, “Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective,” International journal of human-computer studies, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 451-474, 2003.
[41] K. A. Bollen, Structural equations with latent variables: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.
[42] T. Y. Lam, and D. A. Maguire, “Structural equation modeling: theory and applications in forest management,” International Journal of Forestry Research, vol. 2012, 2012.
[43] J. F. Hair, R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, and W. C. Black, "Multivariate Data Analysis New Jersey," Pearson Education London, UK, 2010.
[44] E. Adell, "Acceptance of driver support systems." pp. 475-486.
[45] R. Madigan, T. Louw, M. Wilbrink, A. Schieben, and N. Merat, “What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems,” Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, vol. 50, pp. 55-64, 2017.
[46] R. Gevaers, E. Van de Voorde, and T. Vanelslander, “Cost modelling and simulation of last-mile characteristics in an innovative B2C supply chain environment with implications on urban areas and cities,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 125, pp. 398-411, 2014.
[47] S. Kapser, User acceptance of autonomous delivery vehicles–an empirical study in Germany: University of Northumbria at Newcastle (United Kingdom), 2019.
[48] N. Marsden, T. Bernecker, R. Zöllner, N. Sußmann, and S. Kapser, "BUGA: log–A real-world laboratory approach to designing an automated transport system for goods in Urban Areas." pp. 1-9.
[49] M. Knobloch, and M. Schaarschmidt, “What impedes consumers’ delivery drone service adoption? A risk perspective,” Arb. Fachbereich Inform, pp. 1-18, 2020.
[50] T. Boone, and R. Ganeshan, “Exploratory analysis of free shipping policies of online retailers,” International journal of production economics, vol. 143, no. 2, pp. 627-632, 2013.
[51] C. P. Moreau, D. R. Lehmann, and A. B. Markman, “Entrenched knowledge structures and consumer response to new products,” Journal of marketing research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 14-29, 2001.
[52] J. N. Sheth, “Perceived risk and diffusion of innovations,” Insights into consumer behavior, pp. 173-188, 1968.
[53] J.-H. Wu, and S.-C. Wang, “What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model,” Information & management, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 719-729, 2005.
[54] C. A. Mandrik, and Y. Bao, “Exploring the concept and measurement of general risk aversion,” ACR North American Advances, 2005.
[55] A. Giovanis, C. Assimakopoulos, and C. Sarmaniotis, “Adoption of mobile self[1]service retail banking technologies: The role of technology, social, channel and personal factors,” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 894-914, 2019.
[56] J. Y. Choe, J. J. Kim, and J. Hwang, “Innovative marketing strategies for the successful construction of drone food delivery services: Merging TAM with TPB,” Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 16-30, 2021.
[57] J. Hwang, H. Kim, J. J. Kim, and I. Kim, “Investigation of perceived risks and their outcome variables in the context of robotic restaurants,” Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 263-281, 2021.
[58] C. Fornell, and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of marketing research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39-50, 1981.
[59] A. W. Pearson, and G. Lumpkin, "Measurement in family business research: How do we measure up?," 4, Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2011, pp. 287-291.
[60] R. B. Kline, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications, 2023.
[61] W. W. Chin, “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling,” Modern methods for business research, vol. 295, no. 2, pp. 295-336, 1998.
[62] J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling,” Journal of the academy of marketing science, vol. 43, pp. 115-135, 2015.
[63] N. Kock, “Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach,” International Journal of e-Collaboration (ijec), vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1- 10, 2015.
[64] M. K. Leong, and K. Y. Koay, “Towards a unified model of consumers’ intentions to use drone food delivery services,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 113, pp. 103539, 2023.
[65] I. Waris, R. Ali, A. Nayyar, M. Baz, R. Liu, and I. Hameed, “An empirical evaluation of customers’ adoption of drone food delivery services: An extended technology acceptance model,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 2922, 2022.
[66] L. Chen, and A. K. Aklikokou, “Determinants of E-government adoption: testing the mediating effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use,” International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 850-865, 2020.
[67] K. Tamilmani, N. P. Rana, and Y. K. Dwivedi, "Mobile application adoption predictors: systematic review of UTAUT2 studies using weight analysis." pp. 1- 12.
[68] Gao, J., & Liu, Y. Understanding public acceptance of autonomous delivery robots: Evidence from a survey in Japan. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 38(10), 2022, pp. 901-912.
