<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Amirkabir University of Technology</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-297X</Issn>
				<Volume>49</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Performance Improvement of Biological BOD in Rivers based on De-noising Comparison Wavelet-ANN Conjunction, GP, ANN and MLR Methods (Case Study:Karaj Dam Outlet Station)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Performance Improvement of Biological BOD in Rivers based on De-noising Comparison Wavelet-ANN Conjunction, GP, ANN and MLR Methods (Case Study:Karaj Dam Outlet Station)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>273</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>284</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">710</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22060/ceej.2016.710</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Taher</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rajaee</LastName>
<Affiliation>Civil Engineering Department, University of Qom, Qom, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hamideh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jafari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Civil Engineering Department, University of Qom, Qom, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Roghaye</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rahimi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Civil Engineering Department, University of Qom, Qom, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study considered artificial neural network (ANN), multi-linear regression (MLR), Genetic &lt;br /&gt;Programming (GP) and wavelet analysis and ANN combination (WANN), models for monthly water &lt;br /&gt;biological oxygen demand (BOD) in station Karaj Dam outlet and investigates the effects of data &lt;br /&gt;preprocessing on model performance using discrete wavelet. For this purpose, In the first proposed &lt;br /&gt;model, observed time series of BOD were decomposed into several subtime series at different scales by &lt;br /&gt;discrete wavelet transform. Then these subtime series were imposed as inputs to the ANN method. In &lt;br /&gt;the second proposed model, observed time series of BOD were decomposed at ten scales by wavelet &lt;br /&gt;analysis. Then, total effective time series BOD were imposed as inputs to the neural network model for &lt;br /&gt;prediction of BOD in one month ahead. Results showed that the wavelet neural network models &lt;br /&gt;performance was better in prediction rather than the neural network and multilinear regression &lt;br /&gt;models. The wavelet analysis model produced reasonable predictions for the extreme values. This &lt;br /&gt;model dropped the mean absolute percentage error for the MLR, GP, ANN and the first hybrid &lt;br /&gt;models from 1.87, 0.91, 0.65 and 0.46 respectively, to 0.44 and increased the Nash-Sutcliffe model &lt;br /&gt;efficiency coefficient from 0.23, 0.53, 0.73 and 0.81 to 0.83.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This study considered artificial neural network (ANN), multi-linear regression (MLR), Genetic &lt;br /&gt;Programming (GP) and wavelet analysis and ANN combination (WANN), models for monthly water &lt;br /&gt;biological oxygen demand (BOD) in station Karaj Dam outlet and investigates the effects of data &lt;br /&gt;preprocessing on model performance using discrete wavelet. For this purpose, In the first proposed &lt;br /&gt;model, observed time series of BOD were decomposed into several subtime series at different scales by &lt;br /&gt;discrete wavelet transform. Then these subtime series were imposed as inputs to the ANN method. In &lt;br /&gt;the second proposed model, observed time series of BOD were decomposed at ten scales by wavelet &lt;br /&gt;analysis. Then, total effective time series BOD were imposed as inputs to the neural network model for &lt;br /&gt;prediction of BOD in one month ahead. Results showed that the wavelet neural network models &lt;br /&gt;performance was better in prediction rather than the neural network and multilinear regression &lt;br /&gt;models. The wavelet analysis model produced reasonable predictions for the extreme values. This &lt;br /&gt;model dropped the mean absolute percentage error for the MLR, GP, ANN and the first hybrid &lt;br /&gt;models from 1.87, 0.91, 0.65 and 0.46 respectively, to 0.44 and increased the Nash-Sutcliffe model &lt;br /&gt;efficiency coefficient from 0.23, 0.53, 0.73 and 0.81 to 0.83.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">artificial neural network</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">BOD</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">De-noising</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Karaj River</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Wavelet transformy</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ceej.aut.ac.ir/article_710_e70611883d2760c8bbafb4acb29e3446.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
