<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Amirkabir University of Technology</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-297X</Issn>
				<Volume>52</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>3D Numerical Stability Investigation of Sand Slope Reinforced Using Geogrid Encased Stone Column</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>3D Numerical Stability Investigation of Sand Slope Reinforced Using Geogrid Encased Stone Column</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>531</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>550</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">3104</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22060/ceej.2018.14678.5718</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hajiazizi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Civil Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-5006-7057</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Masoud</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nasiri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Razi University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>02</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>One of the efficient ways for reinforcing the earth’s slope is Geogrid Encased Stone Column (GESC). This technique can increase bearing capacity and decrease the settlement rate of the slope. The goal of this study is to perform a three-dimensional finite-difference numerical study on the behavior of GESC in the stabilization of sand slope. According to the results of the three-dimensional finite-difference analysis, the existence of GESC in the middle of the sand slope, as the optimal location for stone column placement, increased stability to an ideal level compared with the ordinary stone column (OSC). Different parameters including stone column diameter, coupling spring cohesion, coupling spring friction, center to center distance of columns (S/D ratio), and the layout of encasements were evaluated and discussed in this paper. The results indicated that the efficient parameter in geogrid is coupling spring cohesion; in which by increasing this parameter, slope bearing capacity increased linearly (i.e. the bearing capacity of slope reinforced using GESC could enhance up to 1.8 times of slope reinforced using OSC). In the case of row stone implementation, the maximum bearing capacity was that of S/D=2. However, a decrease in the S/D ratio did not necessarily increase the bearing capacity of slopes.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">One of the efficient ways for reinforcing the earth’s slope is Geogrid Encased Stone Column (GESC). This technique can increase bearing capacity and decrease the settlement rate of the slope. The goal of this study is to perform a three-dimensional finite-difference numerical study on the behavior of GESC in the stabilization of sand slope. According to the results of the three-dimensional finite-difference analysis, the existence of GESC in the middle of the sand slope, as the optimal location for stone column placement, increased stability to an ideal level compared with the ordinary stone column (OSC). Different parameters including stone column diameter, coupling spring cohesion, coupling spring friction, center to center distance of columns (S/D ratio), and the layout of encasements were evaluated and discussed in this paper. The results indicated that the efficient parameter in geogrid is coupling spring cohesion; in which by increasing this parameter, slope bearing capacity increased linearly (i.e. the bearing capacity of slope reinforced using GESC could enhance up to 1.8 times of slope reinforced using OSC). In the case of row stone implementation, the maximum bearing capacity was that of S/D=2. However, a decrease in the S/D ratio did not necessarily increase the bearing capacity of slopes.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sandy Slope</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Stone Column</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Geogrid</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Reinforcement</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Numerical investigation</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ceej.aut.ac.ir/article_3104_75b9b6dc7fe44437c6e0a69fd863dbab.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
