p. 3−20
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 21−34
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 35−56
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 57−70
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 71−88
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 89−106
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 107−126
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 127−148
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 149−170
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 171−184
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 185−200
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 201−212
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 213−228
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 229−246
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
have been the most effective near-fault-earthquake parameters. In the present study, attempts were made to determine the effect of these parameters on such bridges using a verified software model by a field test and analyzing two horizontally curved bridges. Three suites of near-fault records were used to conduct time-history analysis with three parameters, namely magnitude, PGV, and Tp < /sub>. In each suite, two of these parameters are almost constant, and the third parameter is variable to observe its effect on the result. The results indicated that the change in PGV has the most significant effect on the behaviors of such bridges. Also, the effect of Tp < /sub> increases in longer bridges. If the difference between the lateral displacement of two ends of the deck is considered as criteria for assessing the potential of deck rotation, increasing in bridge length and being in a near-fault area can lead to an increase in bridge deck rotation behavior up to 2.37 and 2.47 times, respectively.]]>
p. 247−260
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 261−272
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 273−296
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 297−312
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 313−330
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 331−342
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 343−366
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 367−382
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 383−394
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 395−410
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1
p. 411−418
2588-2988
Vol.53/No.1